93
Non-neutralizing Antibody that Prevents SIV Infection in Neonatal Rhesus Macaques Potently Inhibits SIV in the Presence of Rhesus Macaque Effector Cells
Donald Forthal*1, G Landucci1, K Stefano Cole2, J Becerra1, M Marthas3, and K Van Rompay3
1Univ of California Sch of Med, Irvine, US; 2Univ of Pittsburgh Sch of Med, PA, US; and 3California Natl Primate Res Ctr, Univ of California, Davis, US
Background: Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)
hyperimmune serum (HIS), pooled from adult neonatal rhesus macaques (rhM)
immunized with SIVmac1A11, prevents infection of newborn rhM after
oral challenge with pathogenic SIVmac251. However, SIV-HIS does not
neutralize the challenge strain, and the correlate of protection is unknown. We
determined whether SIV-HIS could inhibit virus in the presence of rh peripheral
blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) effector cells. We also determined the anti-viral
activity of 3 non-neutralizing rhM monoclonal antibodies.
Methods: CD8-depleted
rh PBMC target cells were infected with SIVmac251 for 48 hours,
washed, and mixed with serial dilutions of SIV-HIS, SIV-IgG, or SIV-F(ab’)2.
Autologous rh PBMC effector cells were then added at various E:T ratios. Five
days later, p27 was measured in supernatant fluid by ELISA. To determine which
specific cells among the rh PBMC were acting as effector cells, rh PBMC were
depleted of CD8 or CD14+ cells. As above, 3 rhM monoclonal
antibodies (3.10A, 3.11E, and C26) were tested, except that target cells
consisted of SIVmac251-infected CEM x 174 cells and effector cells
were hu PBMC.
Results: In
the absence of effector cells, SIV-HIS had little inhibitory activity against
SIVmac251, consistent with its poor neutralizing activity. However,
in the presence of rh PBMC effector cells, there was inhibition of virus yield
at dilutions as high as 1:12,800. SIV-IgG (made from SIV-HIS) inhibited virus
in the presence of rh PBMC at concentrations as low as 2 μg/mL, whereas
its F(ab’)2 had little activity. CD14+ cells (monocytes) were
consistently involved as effector cells of anti-viral activity; CD8+
cells (likely natural killer cells) acted as effector cells in PBMC from some
animals, but not from others. Monoclonal antibodies 3.10A and 3.11E, neither of
which neutralizes SIVmac251, gave means of 80% and 91% inhibition of
SIVmac251, respectively, at 20 μg/mL in the presence of hu PBMC
effector cells. C26, which does not neutralize SIVmac251, did not
inhibit SIVmac251 in the presence of hu PBMC.
Conclusions: These
results demonstrate, for the first time, that antibodies that do not neutralize
pathogenic strains of SIV may nonetheless have potent anti-viral activity
mediated by interactions between antibody Fc and Fc receptors on rhesus macaque
cells, such as monocytes and natural killer cells. Since infusion of SIV-HIS
prevents SIVmac251 infection in the absence of neutralizing
activity, these results suggest that antibody-dependent, cell-mediated virus
inhibition is a protective immune function against primate lentivirus
infection.
|