614
Development of a Cell Culture Assay to Predict which Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor-resistant Variants Will Emerge during Clinical Therapy
Carrie Dykes* and L Demeter
Univ of Rochester, Sch of Med and Dentistry,NY, US
Background: A
major obstacle to the efficient pre-clinical evaluation of new non-nucleoside
reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) is the lack of a cell culture assay
that will predict the dominant-resistance mutations in clinical isolates during
therapy. Historically, passage experiments of wild type HIV-1 in the presence
of escalating drug have been used for this purpose. These assays notably did
not predict the frequent occurrence of K103N and Y181C during therapy with
delavirdine (DLV) and K103N during therapy with efavirenz (EFV). Since
NNRTI-resistant variants likely pre-exist in patients before therapy is
initiated, we postulated that infecting cells with a mixture of wild type and
NNRTI-resistant variants followed by growth in the presence of drug would be a
better model system.
Methods: We
produced wild type and mutant NL4-3 stocks (K103N, Y181C, P236L, V106A, G190A,
G190S) separately by transfection into 293 cells. PM1 cells (7 x 106)
were infected with a total of 300 ng of a virus mixture (88% wild type and 2%
of each mutant, based on p24 content of each virus stock). Replicate cultures
were infected and propagated in the presence of different concentrations of EFV
(0, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 250, 500, 750, and 1000 nM) or DLV (0, 100, 300, 1000,
and 3000 nM). To determine the proportion of each variant, HIV protease and RT
were amplified from genomic cellular DNA at day 6. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
products were then sequenced from protease codons 49 to 99 and RT codons 1 to 320
to determine the dominant variant. The relative proportion of each variant was
estimated by measuring relative peak heights on the electropherogram, and viral
growth was quantified using p24 antigen concentration in the culture
supernatant.
Results: Only
cultures with demonstrable virus growth were analyzed (all DLV concentrations
and ≤100 nM EFV). The dominant variant present in the no drug controls
was wild type (100%). The dominant mutant present at all time points and in all
EFV concentrations <100 nM was K103N (100%). A minority G190S variant (20%)
was present in addition to K103N (80%) at 100 nM EFV. The dominant variants
present at all DLV concentrations were K103N (55 to 70%) and Y181C (15 to 40%).
No other mutations were observed.
Conclusions: We
have developed a growth competition assay with pre-existing minority NNRTI-resistant
variants that better mimics the selection of NNRTI-resistant mutants during
clinical therapy with EFV and DLV. This assay may prove useful in predicting
which variants will dominate during therapy with newer NNRTI.
|