781 
The Safety of Tenofovir DF for the Treatment of HIV Infection: The First 4 Years
M Nelson1, David Cooper*2, R Schooley3, C Katlama4, J Montaner5, S Curtis6, L Hsu6, B Lu6, S Smith6, J Rooney6, and the Viread Global Expanded Access Prgm
1Chelsea and Westminster Hosp, London, UK; 2Univ of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; 3Univ of California, San Diego, US; 4Hosp Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France; 5Univ of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; and 6Gilead Sci, Foster City, CA, US
Background: Tenofovir DF (TDF) was
approved for the treatment of HIV infections in 2001 and is widely prescribed. We
sought to evaluate the safety profile of TDF over its first 4 years of use.
Methods: Safety data were evaluated from compassionate
use/expanded access programs (EAP) in the United States,
Europe, Australia, and Canada, as well
as from post-marketing safety reports received through April 30, 2005. Serious
adverse events were tabulated, and serious adverse events of clinical
importance were characterized. Serum creatinine and
phosphates were collected in >1600 patients in the EAP program.
Results: Data were reviewed from 10,343 patients in
EAP programs and spontaneous post-marketing safety reports representing 455,392
patient-years of exposure to TDF. Serious adverse events were reported by 631
patients (6 %) in the EAP programs (211 [2%] serious adverse events related),
and no single type of serious adverse event was observed in >1% of patients.
In the EAP program, the most common serious adverse events were pneumonia
(0.63%), renal (0.57%), pancreatitis (0.47%), fever (0.40%),
and bacterial infections (0.26%); related serious adverse events were pancreatitis (0.28%), renal (0.22%), fever (0.15%),
pneumonia (0.14%), and diarrhea (0.09%). In the post-marketing safety database,
the reporting rates were highest for renal, pancreatitis,
lactic acidosis, hepatitis, and diarrhea. Serious renal serious adverse events
in the EAP and post-marketing included renal failure (0.3% of patients; 0.50
cases/1000 patient-years, respectively) Fanconi/tubular
disorder (0.05%; 0.43), and elevated serum creatinine (0.10%; 0.19). Risk
factors for renal serious adverse events included concomitant nephrotoxic
medications and low CD4 cell count. Grade 3 or 4 elevations in serum creatinine
were reported for 0.3% of 1699 patients in the EAP program. For post-marketing renal
serious adverse events with creatinine data, the
median maximum serum creatinine was 2.3 mg/dL (IQR
4.0), and median time to resolution to grade 2 or less was 29.0 days (95%CI 17
to 45). Mitochondrial toxicity, neuropathy, and bone fractures were reported infrequently
in the EAP (£0.1%)
or post-marketing database.
Conclusions: Safety data received during the first 4 years of
TDF use demonstrate that the drug is well tolerated in HIV patients. The pattern of serious adverse events, including renal events, are
similar in the post-marketing and EAP databases. The incidence of serious renal
serious adverse events was 0.57% among 10,695 patiens
in the EAP; risk factors included concomitant nephrotoxic medications and low
CD4 cell count. Bone fractures, neuropathy, and mitochondrial toxicity were
reported infrequently.
|