Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 96 Poster Abstracts
Clinical Pharmacology of Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Session Day and Time: Tuesday, 1:30 - 3:30 pm
Poster Hall


571
Multilocus Gene-Gene Interactions May Predict Efavirenz Pharmacokinetics and Treatment Response: Analysis NWCS 213 of ACTG Study 384
Alison Motsinger*1, M Ritchie1, R Shafer2, G Robbins3, G Morse4, G Wilkinson1, D Clifford5, R D’aquila1, R Kim1, and D Haas1
1Vanderbilt Univ Sch of Med, Nashville, TN, US; 2Stanford Univ, CA, US; 3Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA, USA; 4State Univ of New York, Buffalo, US; and 5Washington Univ, St Louis, MO, US

 

 

 

Background:  Relationships between human genetic variants and efavirenz (EFV) pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and toxicity are incompletely understood. In previous univariate analyses involving ACTG protocol 384, CYP2B6 516G>T was associated with greater EFV plasma AUC24h values (confirming findings from ACTG studies A5095/A5097s), but not virologic response. Conversely, MDR1 3435C>T was associated with decreased EFV virologic failure but not EFV plasma exposure. The present study explored the ability of gene-gene interactions to predict EFV pharmacokinetics, efficacy and toxicity among ACTG 384 participants.

Methods:  The present analysis involved ART-naïve subjects who received EFV (with or without nelfinavir [NFV]) plus 2 nucleoside analogues (zidovudine/lamivudine [AZT/3TC] or stavudine [d4T]+didanosine [ddI]) in ACTG 384, and contributed specimens to the ACTG Human DNA Repository under Protocol A5128. Population pharmacokinetics was estimated from a non-linear mixed effects model assuming 1 compartment and first-order absorption. Wee identified 9 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in CYP2B6, 3A4, 3A5, 2C19, and MDR1. For analyses of EFV exposure, plasma EFV AUC24h values in the top quartile were compared with values in the lower 3 quartiles. Virologic and toxicity failure analyses were limited to subjects who received EFV without NFV. Main effects and gene-gene interactions were explored using multifactor dimensionality reduction.

Results:  The 305 study subjects included were 49% white, 33% black, and 16% Hispanic. Plasma EFV AUC24h values in the top quartile were predicted by CYP2B6 516G>T in the total cohort, and among whites and blacks analyzed separately (accuracy = 73%, 80%, and 69%, respectively; p <0.001 for each). Among whites a 2-gene interaction between CYP2B6 516G>T and MDR1 2677G>T predicted higher plasma EFV exposure (82% accuracy, p <0.001). In blacks an interaction between CYP2B6 516G>T and CYP3A5 6896A>G predicted EFV exposure (64% accuracy, p <0.013). Among 155 subjects who received EFV without NFV, decreased virologic failure was predicted by an interaction between MDR1 2677G>T and CYP2B6 516G>T (65% accuracy, p <0.001), and increased toxicity failure by an interaction between MDR1 2677G>T and MDR1 3435C>T (71% accuracy, p <0.001). MDR1 3435C>T and 2566G>T were in linkage disequilibrium.

Conclusions:  Interactions between variant drug metabolism and transporter genes may predict EFV pharmacokinetics and treatment responses. The predictive accuracy of gene-gene interactions may differ among racial/ethnic groups.