571
Multilocus Gene-Gene Interactions May Predict Efavirenz Pharmacokinetics and Treatment Response: Analysis NWCS 213 of ACTG Study 384
Alison Motsinger*1, M Ritchie1, R Shafer2, G Robbins3, G Morse4, G Wilkinson1, D Clifford5, R D’aquila1, R Kim1, and D Haas1
1Vanderbilt Univ Sch of Med, Nashville, TN, US; 2Stanford Univ, CA, US; 3Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA, USA; 4State Univ of New York, Buffalo, US; and 5Washington Univ, St Louis, MO, US
Background: Relationships
between human genetic variants and efavirenz (EFV) pharmacokinetics, efficacy,
and toxicity are incompletely understood. In previous univariate analyses involving
ACTG protocol 384, CYP2B6 516G>T was
associated with greater EFV plasma AUC24h
values (confirming findings from ACTG studies A5095/A5097s), but not
virologic response. Conversely, MDR1
3435C>T was associated with decreased EFV virologic failure but not EFV
plasma exposure. The present study explored the ability of gene-gene
interactions to predict EFV pharmacokinetics, efficacy and toxicity among ACTG
384 participants.
Methods: The present analysis
involved ART-naïve subjects who
received EFV (with or without nelfinavir [NFV]) plus 2 nucleoside analogues (zidovudine/lamivudine
[AZT/3TC] or stavudine [d4T]+didanosine [ddI]) in ACTG 384, and contributed
specimens to the ACTG Human DNA Repository under Protocol A5128. Population pharmacokinetics was estimated from a non-linear mixed
effects model assuming 1 compartment and first-order absorption. Wee identified
9 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in CYP2B6, 3A4, 3A5,
2C19, and MDR1. For analyses of EFV exposure, plasma EFV AUC24h values in the top quartile
were compared with values in the lower 3 quartiles. Virologic and toxicity failure
analyses were limited to subjects who received EFV without NFV. Main effects and gene-gene
interactions were explored using multifactor dimensionality reduction.
Results: The 305 study
subjects included were 49% white, 33% black, and 16% Hispanic. Plasma EFV AUC24h values in the top quartile
were predicted by CYP2B6 516G>T in
the total cohort, and among whites and blacks analyzed separately (accuracy =
73%, 80%, and 69%, respectively; p <0.001
for each). Among whites a 2-gene interaction between CYP2B6 516G>T and MDR1 2677G>T predicted higher plasma EFV exposure (82%
accuracy, p <0.001). In blacks an
interaction between CYP2B6 516G>T and
CYP3A5 6896A>G predicted EFV exposure (64% accuracy, p <0.013). Among 155 subjects who received EFV without NFV, decreased virologic
failure was predicted by an interaction between MDR1 2677G>T and CYP2B6 516G>T (65% accuracy, p <0.001), and increased toxicity
failure by an interaction between MDR1 2677G>T
and MDR1 3435C>T (71% accuracy, p <0.001). MDR1 3435C>T and 2566G>T were in linkage disequilibrium.
Conclusions: Interactions
between variant drug metabolism and transporter genes may predict EFV pharmacokinetics
and treatment responses. The predictive accuracy of gene-gene interactions may differ
among racial/ethnic groups.
|