Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 36 Oral Abstracts
HIV Drug Resistance: Mechanisms and Impact on Response to New Agents
Session Day and Time: Wednesday, 10 am - 12:30 pm
Presentation Time: 11:15 am
Room: Lecture Hall


157
Effect of Baseline Susceptibility and On-treatment Mutations on TMC114 and Control PI Efficacy: Preliminary Analysis of Data from PI-experienced Patients from POWER 1 and POWER 2
Sandra De Meyer*1, A Hill2, I De Baere1, L Rimsky1, H Azijn1, B Van Baelen1, E De Paepe1, T Vangeneugden1, E Lefebvre3, and M P De Béthune1
1Tibotec BVBA, Mechelen, Belgium; 2Univ of Liverpool, UK; and 3Tibotec, Yardley, PA, US

Background:  TMC114 with low-dose ritonavir (TMC114/r) showed significant efficacy benefits over investigator-selected control protease inhibitors (CPI) in the POWER 1 (TMC114-C213) and 2 (TMC114-C202) trials. This sub-analysis examines pooled baseline and on-treatment resistance data from both trials.

Methods:  Patients with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), NRTI, and PI experience, at least 1 primary PI mutation and HIV RNA >1000 copies/mL were randomized to receive an optimized NRTI background regimen, with or without enfuvirtide (EFV), and either TMC114/r or a CPI of choice. Pheno/genotypes of plasma viruses and site-directed mutants were determined by Virco. At week 24, efficacy was analyzed by baseline genotype and sensitivity to the CPI using phenotypic cut-offs of 10 for lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r), 2.5 for saquinavir (SQV), 2.5 for aprenavir (APV), and 2.4 for atazanavir (ATV); HIV RNA data were analyzed by the intent-to-treat non-completer = failure method.

Results:  Mean baseline HIV RNA was 4.6 log10 copies/mL, with median 8 PI-resistance-associated mutations. Week-24 HIV RNA data are shown in the table. Multivariate analysis showed that HIV RNA log10 reduction for TMC114/r was significantly greater than for either a sensitive or resistant CPI (p <0.0001). Mutations were identified as being associated with decreased susceptibility to TMC114 by a stepwise regression model performed on 1405 screening samples from various trials in highly experienced patients. Among those mutations, the presence of V32I, I47V, or I54M at baseline, was associated with a lower mean decrease in viral load at week 24 (<1 log10 but >0.5 log10) but still higher than control. Presence of V32I, I47V, or I54M at baseline was associated with a higher number of PI-resistance-associated mutations compared with isolates without those mutations. Site-directed mutants with these mutations in different combinations did not show a TMC114 fold change >4. Analysis of patients receiving TMC114/r who responded and then lost their antiviral response showed development of mutations V32I, L33F, I47V, or I54L.

 

 

TMC114/r

 

 

Group

(600/100 mg
twice daily)

Sensitive CPI

Resistant CPI

n

112

31

81

HIV RNA log10 change

–1.90

–0.76

–0.37

% ≥1 log10 reduction

71

36

14

% <50 copies/mL

47

25

9

 

Conclusions:  TMC114/r 600/100 mg twice daily showed significant efficacy benefits over CPI, independent of baseline CPI susceptibility. In a background of a substantial number of PI-resistance mutations, particular additional mutations may be associated with reduced TMC114 susceptibility.