577 
Tipranavir Genotypic Inhibitory Quotient Predicts Early Virological Response to TPV-based Salvage Regimens
Stefano Bonora*, D Gonzalez De Requena, A Calcagno, M Milia, A D'Avolio, M Sciandra, S Garazzino, M Siccardi, A Sinicco, and G Di Perri
Univ of Turin, Italy
Background:
Virological
response to tipranavir (TPV)-based regimen showed to be associated with number
of mutations of the protease gene, use of enfuvirtide (T20) and inhibitory
quotient (gIQ). The role of the simpler to derive genotypic IQ (gIQ) has not yet
been investigated. The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship
between TPV gIQ and early virological response to TPV-based salvage regimens.
Methods:
Patients placed on regimens containing 2 nucleoside reverse
transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) +TPV/ritonavir (RTV) 500/200 mg twice daily
with or without T20 were prospectively studied. HIV RNA (viral load) and CD4+
cell count were recorded at baseline and at week 4, 8, and 12. TPV Ctrough
were measured at week 2, 4, 8, and 12 by a validated high-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) system. Baseline genotypic resistance test and virtual
phenotype were obtained. We used previously suggested TPV mutation score with
21 mutations at 16 protease codons. TPV gIQ was calculated as the ratio between mean
concentration of all available TPV Ctrough and number of
TPV-associated mutations. Optimized background score (OBS) was calculated as
the number of active drugs according to baseline virtual phenotype. Early
virological response (HIV RNA<50 copies/mL) at week 12 was assessed. Values
were given as median (IQR).
Results: We
included 27 multi-experienced patients. T20 was associated in 14 (51.8%)
subjects. Baseline viral load and CD4+ cell count were 4.7 log (4.17
to 5.07) and 226 cells/mm3 (189 to 311), respectively. At week 12
viral load decrease was –2.15 (–3.07;–0.43), 11 patients (40.7%) had a viral
load of <50 copies/mL, and CD4+ cell count increase was 8
cells/mm3 (–64; +61.5). Viral load decrease was correlated to TPV
gIQ (R = 0.607, p = 0.001) and not to TPV Ctrough (R = –0.338, p = 0.085),
number of TPV mutations (R = 0.364, p = 0.062), optomized background score (R = –0.329, p = 0.094), and T20 use (R
= 0.05, p = 0.97). TPV gIQ was the
only predictor of viral load undetectability at week 12 by logistic regression
analysis (p = 0.026). The TPV gIQ
value associated with 50% probability of being undetectable at week 12 (EC50)
was 13,000. At this time point, 7 of 9 subjects with a TPV gIQ >13,000 had a
viral load of <50 copies/mL, whereas only 4 of 18 subjects with TPV gIQ
<13,000 had an undetectable viral load ( c2 = 7.6, p
= 0.011).
Conclusions: TPV gIQ
showed to predict EVR to TPV-containing salvage regimens better than TPV Ctrough
or TPV- associated mutations alone. A possible TPV gIQ cut-off value (13,000)
for reaching and undectable viral load at week 12 was suggested. Further
studies are needed to evaluate TPV gIQ as a new tool to optimize TPV-based
salvage therapy.
|