272 
Analysis of Cleavage Site Determinants within HIV-1 Subtype A, B, and C Gag Polyproteins
Roxana Coman*, I Munoz, M Goodenow, and B Dunn
Univ of Florida, Gainesville, US
Background: The proteolytic
cleavage of HIV-1 Gag and Gag/Pol polyproteins,
mediated by the viral aspartic protease, is of paramount importance for the
viral maturation process. Information regarding the order and the rate of Gag/Pol processing events is largely limited to HIV-1 subtype B
viruses. To date, no data are available for Gag/Pol
processing in non-B subtypes.
Methods: We
obtained “near full-length” clones of the gag/pol
genes for subtypes A, B, and C from the NIH Reagent Repository and we analyzed in
trans Gag processing employing an in vitro
transcription-translation system that uses 35S-Met to visualize the
intermediates by autoradiography. Site-directed mutagenesis technique was used
to engineer desired mutations within Gag constructs. We followed in trans processing of Gag polyprotein by protease from the
corresponding subtype, but we also mixed Gag polyproteins
with proteases from other subtypes.
Results: We
observed that in trans processing of subtype A
and C Gag polyproteins produced a p15 intermediate
that migrates on a different position on a Tris/Glycine/SDS
gel when compared with subtype B. When we combined Gag polyproteins with
proteases from different subtypes we noticed that the pattern of cleavage was
dependent on the Gag sequence and seemed not to be influenced by the protease
added in trans. Furthermore, subtype B and C Gag proteins are cleaved
with comparable efficiency by all 3 proteases, while subtype A Gag is processed
at a slower rate. The rate of p24/p25 production is slower in subtype A Gag,
independently of the protease subtype added in trans. Surprinsingly,
densitometric analysis showed that the rate of p24/p25 production is slower
even when subtype A Gag polyprotein is processed by subtype A protease. When we
introduced S124V at MA/CA cleavage site, the production of p24/p25 increased by
3-fold when compared with initial subtype A Gag polyprotein, but did not reach
the level of cleavage observed in subtype B.
Conclusions: The
pattern of cleavages of subtype A, B, and C Gag polyprotein, independent of the
subtype of the protease added in trans, is noticeably similar, indicating that there are
determinants in Gag that modulate the processing events. Additional proof is
brought by the 3-fold increase in p24/p25 yield after the introduction of S124V
mutation at P5 position of MA/CA cleavage site.
|