600 
The Effect of the M184V Substitution in HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase on DNA 3'-end and RNA 5'-end Directed Ribonuclease H Activity
Fei L. Yeh*1, L Miranda2, and D Kuritzkes1
1Brigham and Women's Hosp, Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA, US and 2Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr and Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA, US
Background: Mutations in the polymerase domain of HIV-1
reverse transcriptase (RT) that confer non-nucleoside RT inhibitor (NNRTI)
resistance reduce ribonuclease H (RNase
H) activity. Little is know, however about the effects on RNase H activity of
nucleoside RT inhibitor (NRTI) resistance mutations.
Methods:
Purified RT heterodimer was prepared by
expressing cloned p66 and p51RT subunits of wild type (18A) and zidovudine (AZT)-resistant (18C) isolates. The 184V
mutation for lamivudine (3TC) resistance was introduced into the 18A and 18C RT
by site-directed mutagenesis. In addition, thymidine analog resistance
mutations (TAM: 41L, 67N, 70R, 210W,
215Y, 219Q) and the 184V mutation were introduced into p51 and p66 subunits of
HIV-1 RT from Hxb2. The DNA 3-end-directed and RNA 5-end-directed RNase H
cleavage activity of purified recombinant RTs was characterized using RNA·DNA
hybrid substrates.
Results: Introduction of 184V into the 18A RT
substantially reduced the overall rate of both DNA 3-end-directed and RNA
5-end-directed RNase H cleavage relative to the wild type (18A) enzyme.
However, 184V appeared selectively to enhance the secondary cleavage step. The
18C RT (41L/67N/70R/215Y/219Q) showed a moderate reduction in RNase H activity
compared to 18A. RNase H activity of the 18C-184V RT was similar to 18C.
Likewise, introduction of 184V into an Hxb2 RT substantially reduced 3-end-
and 5-end-directed RNase H cleavage relative to WT Hxb2 RT. However,
introduction of TAM-1 pattern mutations (41L, 210W, 215Y) did not substantially
alter the 5-end-directed cleavage rate.
Conclusions: The 184V mutation had a marked effect on
RNase H function, reducing rates and modifying kinetics during both DNA 3-end-
and RNA 5-end directed cleavages. The effect of TAM on RNase
H activity depended on the specific combination of mutations and the genetic
backbone of the RT. These findings provide evidence that NRTI-resistance
mutations, like NNRTI-resistance mutations, can alter RNase H function.
|