371
Sexual Transmission Risk and Rapid Public Health Intervention in Acute HIV Infection
Christopher D Pilcher*1, E Foust2, R Ashby2, J Kuruc1, T Nguyen1, L Hightow1, N Harrison1, S McCoy1, D Williams2, and P Leone1,2
1Univ of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, US and 2North Carolina Div of Publ Hth, Raleigh, US
Background: Since November 2002, all 135 public HIV-testing
sites in North Carolina have used a combined HIV antibody and RNA testing
algorithm through the State Laboratory of Public Health. In the NC Department
of Health and Human Services Screening & Tracing Active Transmission (STAT)
program, disease intervention specialists provide urgent notification and
partner counseling and referral services to all clients with RNA+
antibody results.
Methods: To evaluate performance
and effect of rapid STAT partner counseling
and referral services in the setting of acute HIV infection, information
was collected at all client interviews on index and contact symptoms, risk
factors, partnership-specific behaviors, and notification, counseling, and
testing outcomes. Transmission to sexual partners was documented by serial HIV
testing of high-risk partners for HIV seroconversion. Transmission rates per
act were estimated based on unprotected acts <45 days of acute index case
diagnosis or <7 days of acute retroviral symptoms onset.
Results: Of 227,566
public tests in NC from November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004, 404 clients were
previously HIV+; 1123 were newly antibody+; 48 additional
clients were RNA+/antibody; 44 (92%) were true acute
infections and 4 were false-positive RNA results. We successfully interviewed 41
true acute; index cases noted 69 anonymous and 130 named individuals who were contacts
(4.85 total, 3.17 named contacts/interview). Of 130 clients, 102 (78%) named
contacts who received successful partner counseling and referral services. Of the
contacts, 39% were HIV+; 21 HIV+ contacts who were interviewed
and counseled were classified as likely source patients (0.56 per index
interview); 68% of source patients were in HIV care; and 37% had previously been
on ART. Seroconversion was documented for 8 of 24 (33%) previously HIV
contacts to acutely infected index cases, of whom 3 were themselves acute (still
antibody negative) at initial contact. HIV was transmitted by acute HIV cases
at a rate >1:13 to 1:18 unprotected coital acts during acute HIV infection.
Conclusions: Partner
counseling and referral services can be highly effective in the setting of
acute HIV infection, where it can be focused on individuals with extraordinary
immediate risk of transmission (>5% per coital act) and large numbers of
risky contacts. Partner counseling and referral services can identify source
patients actively transmitting HIV for additional counseling in as many as half
of cases; in North Carolina, most source patients are chronically infected.
|