Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 98 Poster Abstracts
Clinical Pharmacology of Other Drug Classes
Session Day and Time: Tuesday, 1:30 - 3:30 pm
Poster Hall


582
Pharmacokinetics of Vicriviroc are not Affected in Combination with Five Different Protease Inhibitors Boosted by Ritonavir
Angela Sansone*, A Keung, E Tetteh, H Weisbrot, M Martinho, S Lang, R Keller, and M Kraan
Schering-Plough Res Inst, Kenilworth, NJ, US

Background: Combination antiretroviral therapy is standard of care for HIV/AIDS. Many agents are metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzymes and/or are affected by the p-glycoprotein transporter protein (pGp).  In this study, the potential interaction of several ritonavir (RTV) boosted protease inhibitors (PI) on vicriviroc (VVC), a novel CCR5 receptor antagonist, were evaluated.

Methods: An open-label, fixed sequence, sequential period, multiple-drug interaction study was conducted in 8 exonerative volunteers for each PI.  VVC pharmacokinetics (PK) were evaluated in combination with 5 PIs boosted with RTV.  PIs studied were: atazanavir (ATV) [300mgQD], indinavir (IDV) [800mgBID], fosamprenavir (FOS) [700mgBID], nelfinavir (NFV) [1250mgBID], and saquinavir (SQV) [1000mgBID as Fortovase®].  RTV dosing was 100mg QD or BID, as recommended for each PI.  VVC+RTV were given for 14 days prior to addition of each PI; triple combinations were administered for 14 additional days (7 days for ATV) and f/up with boosted PIs without VVC thereafter for 7 days. Plasma concentrations of VVC were collected over a 24-hr period on days 14, 21, and 28 (except ATV). Safety was monitored by clinical and standard lab evaluations and periodic ECGs.  PK parameters calculated included Cmax, Cmin, Tmax, AUC(0-24hr), and CL/F; analyses used standard methodology. 

Results: 8 subjects completed all drug cohorts, except NFV in which 3 subjects discontinued. Two withdrew for non-treatment related causes and one for rash.  PK parameters showed no significant effect of any boosted PI on VVC concentrations measured in a RTV-containing regimen.

 

 

VVC Parameter - mean (%CV)

Treatment (Study Day)

Cmax(ng/mL)

AUC(0-24 hr) (ng•hr/mL)

VVC+RTV(14)

189(25)

3500(29)

VVC+RTV+ATV(21)

206(23)

3880(27)

VVC+RTV(14)

199(22)

3310(26)

VVC+RTV+IDV(28)

189(32)

3540(42)

VVC+RTV(14)

165(22)

2930(25)

VVC+RTV+FOS(28)

165(24)

2850(20)

VVC+RTV(14)

137(19)

2120(33)

VVC+RTV+NFV(28)

122(26)

2000(26)

VVC+RTV(14)

198(27)

3570(26)

VVC+RTV+SQV(28)

223(26)

4000(30)

 

There were no serious AEs. The most frequent AEs were GI disorders and headache. 

 

Conclusions:   There were no significant changes in VVC plasma concentrations when combined with RTV-boosted PIs. Regardless of whether a PI affected other CYP450 enzymes or pGp, no additional effect on VVC exposure was seen over that observed with RTV alone. All 3-agent combinations were well tolerated. Neither modification to VVC dosing, nor therapeutic drug monitoring is needed when VVC is added to a RTV-boosted PI regimen.