486 
Dendritic Cell-HIV Peptide Therapeutic Vaccination Is Safe and Immunogenic in HIV-infected Subjects with Virologic Suppression
Nancy Connolly*1, S Riddler1, C Wilson2, T Whiteside1, and C Rinaldo1
1Univ of Pittsburgh, PA, US and 2Univ of Colorado Hlth Sci Ctr, Denver, US
Background: There
is an urgent need for alternative therapies with the potential to durably
suppress viral replication following therapy discontinuation. Dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccination strategies have been
shown to augment antigen specific immunity in HIV infection and cancer. This randomized,
prospective, phase I trial was designed to evaluate the combination of viral
suppression with restoration of immune function using highly conserved, HIV-1
peptide-pulsed, autologous DC vaccination in HIV-infected individuals on ART.
Methods: A total of 18 HIV-infected, ART-treated (CD4
>400, viral load <50), HLA-A*0201 subjects received autologous DC
vaccination either intravenously or subcutaneously. We administered 2 low-dose
(1 to 3 X 106 DC, n = 6) or
high-dose (5 to 10 X 106 DC, n
= 12) vaccines 3 weeks apart following a standard leukapheresis.
Vaccines were prepared from peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-derived plastic
adherent monocytes cultured in rhIL-4 and rhGM-CSF for 6 days. DC were matured overnight in interleukin
(IL)-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and PGE2 and pulsed for
2 hours with 3 highly conserved HLA-A*0201 supertype
HIV peptides (Gag:386-394, Env:134-142, Pol:498-506)
and 1 HLA-A*0201 Influenza A matrix peptide (Flu:58-66). A positive response
was defined as spot-forming cells (SFC) >2 SD and at least 20 spots per 106
plated cells over background in interferon (IFN)-γ ELISpot assays. A vaccine-induced response was defined as a
≥3-fold increase in SFC over baseline and at least 100 SFC/106
cells in response to at least 1 peptide at any time-point.
Results: All subjects have completed scheduled
vaccinations; the DC vaccines were generally well tolerated. One subject had a grade-4
fever after the first vaccination and did not receive the second. At baseline, 9
of 17 subjects responded to at least 1 HIV vaccine peptide and 11 of 17
responded to the Flu peptide. Of 17 subjects, 11 developed vaccine-induced
responses with 5 responding to 2 or more peptides. Post-vaccination responses
to each of the HIV peptides were observed: Gag (7 subjects), Env
(3), and Pol (5). No significant differences were
noted between high and low dose or the intravenous and subcutaneous cohorts.
Conclusions: DC vaccination was safe and feasible in HIV-infected
subjects on ART with virologic suppression. DC
vaccination with selected HLA-A2 peptides was immunogenic in this cohort. Future,
larger DC vaccine studies utilizing more broadly reactive antigens and clinical
end-points are warranted.
|