713
Assessing the Risk of Central Nervous System Birth Defects Associated with ART Exposure during Pregnancy
Karen Beckerman*1, H Watts2, D Covington3, B Ross4, A Scheuerle5, D Seekins6, P Clax7, and H Tilson8
1Newark Beth Israel Med Ctr, NJ, US; 2Natl Inst of Child Hlth and Devt, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, US; 3Charles River Labs Clin Svcs, Wilmington, NC, US; 4Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD, US; 5Texas State Birth Defects, Dallas, US; 6Bristol-Myers Squibb, Plainsboro, NJ, US; 7Pfizer, New York, NY, US; and 8Univ of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, US
Background: Because animal studies have indicated an
association between first trimester pregnancy exposure to certain ART drugs and
central nervous system birth defects, the ongoing Antiretroviral Pregnancy
Registry (APR) critically reviews all central nervous system defects.
Methods: APR is a prospective exposure-registration
cohort study designed to detect a potential increase in the risk of birth
defects. Clinicians voluntarily register pregnant women with prenatal exposures
to ART and provide birth outcomes. Birth defect prevalence is compared to CDC’s
population-based surveillance system. While the primary analysis is based on
prospective data, APR complements its analyses by comprehensive review of other
data sources (e.g., clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and retrospective
data).
Results: From 1989 through July 2005, APR has
monitored 5169 live births exposed to ART. Among 1980 first trimester
exposures, there were 59 birth defects (3.0%, 95%CI 2.3 to 3.8). This overall
rate is not significantly different from CDC’s rate of 3.1 per 100 live births
(95%CI 3.1 to 3.2). After first trimester exposures, 4 cases of central nervous
system defects were detected among 1980 live births (0.20 of 100 live births,
95%CI 0.004 to 0.40). Among those with later exposure, 5 had central nervous
system defects among 3189 live births (0.16 of 100 live births, 95%CI 0.02 to
0.29). According to national data, about 1 in 235 live births have central
nervous system or eye defects. In APR, central nervous system defects after first
trimester exposure included holoprosencephaly, brain
growth retardation, and 2 with hydrocephalus; and ,after
later exposures, Dandy Walker, lipomeningocele,
caudal thalamic notch cyst, and 2 with hydrocephalus. None were exposed to efavirenz. Among retrospective cases, there were 4 myelomeningocele (neural tube) defects, 3 with efavirenz exposure, and a Dandy Walker defect with efavirenz exposure as reported in the product label (Sustiva® BMS, 8 of 2004). There were
no central nervous system defects in other supplemental studies reviewed.
Conclusions: Within the detection power of the sample
to date, APR data demonstrate no teratogenicity
overall. There does not appear to be an increased risk of central nervous
system defects in the prospective analysis. In the supplemental data, there do
not appear to be any patterns other than the already identified efavirenz signal. Prospective reports of ART exposures are
critically important to determine teratogenic
potential (which can be made by calling 800-258-4263) and may avoid reporting
bias inherent in other forms of data collection.
|