153 
Population-based Prevalence Estimates of Diagnosed and Undiagnosed HIV and Associated Risk Behaviors among New York City Adults, 2004
Trang Quyen Nguyen*1,2, Trang Quyen Nguyen*1,2, R Gwynn1, S Kellerman1, E Begier1, R Garg1, K Konty1, M Pfeiffer1, L Torian1, T Frieden1, and L Thorpe1
1New York City Dept of Hlth and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, US and 2CDC, Atlanta, GA, US
Background: An estimated 25% of HIV infections in the United States
and 22 to 44% in New York City (NYC) are undiagnosed or unreported, so
information on HIV risk behaviors for the general population is difficult to
obtain. This study estimates the prevalence of diagnosed and undiagnosed or unreported
HIV infection in NYC and compares risk behaviors among NYC’s general adult
population of infected and uninfected persons.
Methods: The population-based NYC Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey (HANES) was conducted in 2004 among
non-institutionalized adults aged ≥20 years. To identify previously
reported HIV infection, we matched NYCHANES with NYC’s HIV/AIDS Registry System
(HARS) of all persons with reported HIV infection, using name, date of birth
and social security number. Then with consent, 1626 interviewed participants’
archived blood was tested anonymously for HIV. Weighted analyses accounted for
complex sampling, nonparticipation and post-stratification to represent the
total NYC adult population. Prevalence estimates and 95% confidence intervals were
calculated for HIV infection, undiagnosed or unreported HIV, high-risk
activities, and perceived risk of having HIV/sexually transmitted disease (STD).
Results: HIV prevalence among NYC adults was 1.4% (n = 21; 95%CI, 0.6 to 2.2); 5% (95%CI,
0.7 to 29.9) of HIV-infected adults were not reported in HARS, representing
undiagnosed or unreported HIV. High-risk activities among HIV-infected adults,
including having multiple sex partners (past year) (26%) and inconsistent
condom use by people with multiple partners (past month) (33%), did not differ
significantly from those of uninfected adults. Needle use history did differ
between the infected and uninfected (21 vs 1%, p <0.01). Among people engaging in
high-risk behaviors, while 92% reported low/no risk of currently having
HIV/STD, uninfected persons were more likely to perceive minimal risk compared
with infected persons (p <0.01).
Conclusions: Although the exclusion of institutionalized groups
is a limitation, a smaller proportion of HIV-infected NYC adults was undiagnosed or unreported than previously estimated. Ongoing
risky behaviors indicate that more effective prevention interventions are
needed, particularly for HIV-infected persons. Low risk perception among adults
engaged in high-risk activities highlights the limitations of risk-based
testing. Broader, routine screening will enable identification of infected
persons not targeted for testing or who do not believe they are at risk.
|