Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 101 Poster Abstracts
Clinical Pharmacology of Entry Inhibitors
Session Day and Time: Tuesday, 1 - 4 pm
Poster Hall


572    
Enfuvirtide Does Not Require Dose-adjustment in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure: The Results of a Pharmacokinetic Study of Enfuvirtide in HIV-1-infected Patients with Impaired Renal Function (NP17586)
Pablo Tebas*1, N Bellos2, C Lucasti3, G Richmond4, E Godofsky5, I Patel6, N Buss7, Y Y Chiu6, L Rowell8, and M Salgo6
1Univ of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, US; 2Southwest Infectious Disease Assoc, Dallas, TX, US; 3South Jersey Infectious Disease, Somers Point, NJ, US; 4North Broward Hosp District, Ft Lauderdale, FL, US; 5Bach & Godofsky, Bradenton, FL, US; 6Roche, Nutley, NJ, US; 7Roche, Basel, Switzerland; and 8Roche, Welwyn, UK

Background:  Renal failure is common among HIV-infected patients, but data on dose adjustments of ART in HIV+ individuals are limited. Enfuvirtide (ENF), the only approved fusion inhibitor, is a 36 amino acid peptide administered by subcutaneous injection twice daily. ENF has a high bioavailability (84.3%), small volume of distribution (5.48 L), low systemic clearance (1.4 L/h), and moderately high protein binding (92%). ENF is primarily eliminated via catabolism to its constituent amino acids and has been shown to have a low potential for drug–drug interactions.

Methods:  We evaluated the influence of renal impairment and hemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics of ENF in HIV+ patients receiving HAART. The study was an open-label, parallel group study. Group A included patients with renal creatinine clearance (CL) of 11 to 35 mL/min; group B, patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis (renal creatinine CL ≤10 mL/min); group C, patients with normal renal function (renal creatinine CL >80 mL/min). A single 90-mg dose of ENF was administered subcutaneously to patients in groups A and C and a single 90-mg dose of ENF was administered subcutaneously to group B on 2 occasions, a dialysis and a nondialysis day. After each dose a full 48-hour pharmacokinetic profile was collected. A comparison to pharmacokinetic parameters from past studies was also performed.

Results:  ENF was well tolerated. (Pharmacokinetic parameters are shown in the table.) The number of adverse events was 1, 3, and 1 in groups A, B, and C, respectively. All adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. Of these, only mild headache (possibly), and mild injection site parasthesia (probably) (1 patient in group B) were considered related to treatment.

Group (creatinine CL)

N

Cmax

(mg/mL)

AUCinf (mg.h/mL)

t1/2

(h)

A (11 to 35 mL/min)

4

5.72±1.82

80.3±17.3

4.94±1.18

B (<10 mL/min) non-dialysis day

8

5.34±2.36

71.1±20.6

5.60±1.29

B (<10 mL/min) dialysis day

7

6.31±3.06

66.9±30.9

6.07±2.06

C (>80 mL/min)

8

3.79±1.22

49.6±9.90

6.15±5.34

All values Mean ± SD

 

 

 

 

Conclusions:  Pharmacokinetic exposure observed in patients with ESRD or impaired renal function were slightly higher than patients with normal renal function and similar to historical Cmax and AUC values from studies in patients with normal renal function. The safety profile of a single dose of ENF was similar in the 3 groups. ENF does not require adjustment in patients with impaired renal function.