647 
Prevalence of Treatment Failure and Drug Resistance among Treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected Individuals at a Tertairy HIV Referral Center in South India
Sunil Solomon*1,2, Sunil Solomon*1,2, P Balakrishnan2, N Shetty3, A Cecelia2, V Madhavan2, A Ganesh2, N Kumarasamy2, D Celentano1, S Solomon2, and J Gallant4
1Johns Hopkins Univ Bloomberg Sch of Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD, US; 2YRGCARE, Chennai, India; 3Columbia Univ Mailman Sch of Publ Hlth, New York, NY, US; and 4Johns Hopkins Univ Sch of Med, Baltimore, MD, US
Background: The introduction of generic ART in India dramatically
reduced costs and improved access to therapy. However, numerous factors could
affect the efficacy and durability of ART, including over-the-counter
availability, out-of-pocket payment for medications, and use of alternative
medications. We analyzed the prevalence of virologic failure and extent of drug
resistance among HIV-1-infected, treatment-experienced patients in Chennai,
India.
Methods: This analysis was conducted at YR Gaitonde Centre for AIDS
Research and Education (YRGCARE), which has provided medical care to over 9500 HIV-infected
patients, >4000 of whom have been started on ART. In September 2005, YRGCARE
performed viral-load testing on 95 consecutive patients who had been on ART for
>1 year and who had not switched regimens due to suspected treatment failure
in the prior 6 months. All samples with detectable viral load underwent
genotypic resistance testing and the results were interpreted using the
genotypic resistance interpretation program available at
http://hivdb.stanford.edu. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were
extracted from the hospital database or medical records. Multivariate logistic
regression was performed using SPSS Version 13.0.
Results: Mean age was 33 years; 68% were male. Mean duration of ART
was 32 months. Prevalence of detectable viral load (>400 copies/mL) was 53.7% overall, and was 81.8% among those on therapy
for >4 years. Multivariate analysis revealed that missed doses in the prior
3 days, low CD4 count at viral load quantification and use of nevirapine (NVP) as part of the initial regimen (p <0.05) were associated with a
detectable viral load. Almost all (40 of 41 or 97.5%) patients on non-nucleoside
reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) -containing regimens and 82% (36 of 44)
of patients on lamivudine (3TC) -containing regimens
demonstrated high-level resistance to NNRTI and 3TC, respectively. The most
common NNRTI mutations were K103N (44%), Y181C (25%), G190A (14%), and V106M
(11%). M184V/I was detected in 82%. Intermediate or
high level resistance to NRTI was as follows: thymidine
analogs (18%), tenofovir DF (4.5%), abacavir (20.5%), didanosine
(25%).
Conclusions: Virologic failure
was common among ART-treated patients in Chennai and was associated with drug
resistance. Viral Load monitoring should be used routinely to detect early
treatment failure and minimize drug resistance. Measures to improve adherence
and provide uninterrupted access to HAART may reduce treatment failure rates
and preserve future treatment options.
|