901 
Comparison of Hepatitis C Virus Early Kinetics in HIV/HCV-co-infected Patients Treated with Weight-based Ribavirin + Either PegIFNa-2a or PegIFNa-2b
Pablo Barreiro*, S Rodríguez-Nóvoa, P Labarga, L Martín-Carbonero, A Ruíz-Sancho, C Castellares, J González-Lahoz, and V Soriano
Hosp Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
Background: Pegylated interferon (pegIFN) +
ribavirin (RBV) is the recommended therapy for
chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in HIV+ patients. Pharmacokinetic
differences between the 2 available pegIFN molecules,
a-2a and a-2b, might influence
their antiviral activity.
Methods: All consecutive HCV/HIV-co-infected patients who initiated treatment with pegIFNa (-2a or -2b) + RBV (1000 to 1200 mg/day) at our
institution during 2005 were identified. Patients with prior IFN experience
were excluded. We assessed 3 main virological
end-points: rapid virological
response, defined as HCV RNA <10 IU/mL at week 4;
early virological response, defined as ³2 log drop in HCV RNA
at week 12; and week 24 HCV RNA <10 IU/mL.
Baseline liver fibrosis was estimated in all patients using transient elastometry. Plasma RBV levels were measured by high-performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC) at week 12.
Results: A total of 104 patients were identified; 72
started pegIFNa-2a and 32 pegIFNa-2b. Main
characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. Mean age, 43.2 and 43.5 years;
male gender, 74 and 75%; mean body mass index, 23 and 22 kg/m2; mean
CD4 count, 581 and 572 cells/mL; HIV RNA <50 copies/mL,
69 and 75%; mean HCV RNA, 6.05 and 6.13 log IU/mL;
HCV RNA >800,000 IU/mL, 60 and 69%; HCV genotypes
1-4, 67 and 63%; mean hepatic stiffness, 9.2 vs 10.6 kPa (p = ns for
each variable). Mean RBV plasma levels at week 12 were 2.4±1.1 and 2.3±1.0 mg/mL (p = ns). In
an intent-to-treat analysis, mean HCV RNA decay was 2.6 and 2.6 log IU/mL at week 4; 4 and 3.9 log IU/mL
at week 12; 4.3 and 4.4 log IU/mL at week 24 (p = ns).
Per protocol (on
treatment analysis) virological responses were
comparable for pegIFNa -2a and -2b: rapid virological
response, 25 and 23%; early virological response, 85
and 86%; week 24 undetectability, 81 and 76% (p = ns). Considering only HCV genotypes
1-4: rapid virological response, 17 and 16%; early virological response, 78 and 82%; week 24 undetectability, 77 and 69% (p = ns). For HCV genotypes 2-3: rapid virological
response, 47 and 33%; early virological response, 100
and 91%; week 24 undetectability, 87 and 87% (p = ns). In patients with HCV RNA >800,000
IU/mL: rapid virological
response, 24 vs 14%, early virological
response, 82 vs 85%, and week 24 undetectability,
79 vs 81%, for pegIFNa -2a vs -2b (p = ns).
The best threshold for RBV plasma concentrations at week 12 to predict undetectability at week 24 was 2.1 mg/mL for both pegIFNa -2a and -2b (positive predictive value, 82%).
Conclusions:
The intrinsic antiviral activity of pegIFNa-2a and pegIFNa-2b seems to be
comparable in HCV/HIV-co-infected patients during the first 24 weeks of
therapy. The attainment of high RBV plasma concentrations, rather than the pegIFN modality, is the main determinant for virological success of anti-HCV therapy.
|