911
Prospective Comparison of Transient Elastography and Liver Biopsy for the Assessment of Fibrosis in Patients with HIV/HBV Co-infection
Patrick Miailhes*1, G Perrot1, F Bailly1, M Chevallier2, L Cotte1, P Pradat1, A Boibieux3, and C Trepo1
1Hotel-Dieu, Lyon, France; 2Lab Marcel Merieux, Lyon, France; and 3Croix-Rousse Hosp, Lyon, France
Background: Transient elastography is a novel, non-invasive technique to evaluate
liver stiffness. No data are reported in patients with HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV)
co-infection, and the cut-off distinguishing fibrosis stages is possibly
different from that observed in hepatitis C virus (HCV) -mono- or -co-infected
patients.
Methods: We prospectively assessed
the performance of FibroScan in HIV/HBV-co-infected
patients in comparison with liver biopsy as reference and performed within a
short time frame. Our study was conducted from September 2005 to September 2006
in 31 consecutive HIV/HBV-co-infected patients. All patients had a liver biopsy
except 1 with a previous histologically
proven cirrhosis. Quality of FibroScan was assessed
by a rate of success ≥60% and an interquartile
range (IQR) ≤30% of median elasticity for patients with body mass index
<28. For patients with body mass index >28, we accepted a lower rate of
success (≥30%) with the same level of IQR.
Results: Of 31
patients, 24 (77%) were male; median age was 43 years (range 25 to 64) and
median body mass index was 22 kg/m2 (17 to 32); median duration of
HIV and HBV infection was 11.5 and 9.1 years, respectively. At the time of liver
biopsy, the majority of patients were under HAART (94%), including a molecule
active against HBV in 28 of 29 patients: lamivudine (3TC) in 7,
tenofovir (TDF) in 3, and both in 18 cases. Median time
between liver biopsy and FibroScan was 4.5 days (0 to
195). Liver biopsy and FibroScan were performed on the
same day for 7 patients, and within 1 month for 19 cases. Median length of liver
biopsy was 18 mm.
The METAVIR fibrosis stage was F0F1 for 11, F2 for 10, and F3F4 for 10 patients,
respectively. FibroScan values ranged from 3 to 21 kPa (median 7 kPa). For patients
with F0F1, F2, F3F4 fibrosis score, median liver stiffness measurements were 5.40,
6.80, and 8.35 kPa, respectively. A significant
correlation was observed between liver stiffness measurements and METAVIR
fibrosis stage (τ-B = 0.42; p = 0.002).
ROC curves analyses were conducted to distinguish F0F1 from F2F3F4 and F0F1F2
from F3F4. AUC were 0.79 (IC95%, 0.63 to 0.95, p = 0.009) and 0.73 (IC95%, 0.54 to 0.93, p = 0.038), respectively. Thresholds for the best sensitivity and
specificity were 6.5 kPa for distinguishing patients
with fibrosis ≥F2, and 7.35 kPa for those
≥F3.
Conclusions: Our study confirms the
relevance of FibroScan to evaluate fibrosis in HIV/HBV-co-infected
patients. Since the number of patients was still limited, the exact cut-off value
should be further refined in HIV/HBV co-infection.
|