786
Sex Differences in Lopinavir/Ritonavir Soft Gel Capsule Pharmacokinetics among HIV-infected Females and Males
Obiamiwe Umeh*1, J Currier1, J G Park2, Y Cramer2, S Owens3, A Hermes4, C Fletcher5, and the A5223 Study Group
1Univ of California, Los Angeles CARE Ctr, US; 2Statistical & Data Analysis Ctr, Harvard Sch of Publ Hlth, Boston, MA, US; 3Frontier Sci & Tech Res Fndn, Amherst, NY, US; 4Abbott Virology; and 5Univ of Colorado Hlth Sci Ctr, Denver, US
Background: Sex-related differences in ART
pharmacokinetics among HIV-infected adults and the implications for clinical
practice have not been well studied. Our primary objective was to compare the
area under the concentration time curve (AUC) of lopinavir (LPV) and ritonavir
(RTV) between females and males.
Methods:
This was a multi-center,
prospective intensive pharmacokinetic study in HIV-infected adults treated with
LPV/RTV (400/100 mg twice daily) in soft gel capsule. Enrollment was balanced
by race and sex. Eligible subjects were age (18 and on LPV/RTV in combination
with ≥ART for (2 weeks prior to screening. Major exclusion criteria
were pregnancy, receipt of concomitant second active protease inhibitor (PI),
or other concomitant medications interacting with LPV/RTV. Subjects underwent
serial pharmacokinetic sampling over 12 hours following an observed dose and a
standard breakfast. LPV and RTV concentrations were quantitated by validated
high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC); non-compartmental methods were
used to determine pharmacokinetic parameters. A sample size of 78 subjects had
80% power to detect a 30% difference in LPV AUC between females and males. The
sex differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were compared using the Wilcoxon
rank-sum test.
Results:
We enrolled 78 subjects
(40 men and 38 women) and determined pharmacokinetic parameters in 40 men and
37 women. The median age was 43 years (men 41; women 47). Subjects were well
balanced with respect to race (white non-Hispanic, 31%; black non-Hispanic, 31%;
Hispanic, 31%; Asian/Pacific Islander, 4%; more than 1 race, 4%). The median
baseline CD4 cell count was higher in women than in men (576/mm3 vs
432/mm3) while >80% of both male and female subjects had HIV RNA <400
copies/mL. Pharmacokinetic parameters are shown in Tables 1 and 2;
pharmacokinetics did not significantly differ by race.
Conclusions:
LPV pharmacokinetics
did not differ between women and men. Women had higher RTV AUC and lower CL/F. The
clinical significance of the 20% higher RTV AUC in females should be evaluated
with other protease inhibitors and other concomitant drugs. Mechanisms of the
sex difference in RTV CL/F in HIV-infected women merit further investigation.
|
|
Sex
|
Mean
|
SD
|
p-value
|
|
AUC0-12h (ng*h/mL)
|
M
|
79,608
|
25,606
|
0.092
|
|
F
|
90,938
|
27,838
|
|
C12 (ng/mL)
|
M
|
4,689
|
2,201
|
0.164
|
|
F
|
5,423
|
2,207
|
|
Cmax (ng/mL)
|
M
|
9,243
|
2,506
|
0.111
|
|
F
|
10,405
|
2,989
|
|
Clw/F(L/h/kg)
|
M
|
0.071
|
0.026
|
0.351
|
|
F
|
0.069
|
0.043
|
Table 1: LPV
pharmacokinetic parameters
Table 2: RTV pharmacokinetic parameters
|
|
Sex
|
Mean
|
SD
|
p-value
|
|
AUC0-12h (ng*hr/mL)
|
M
|
4436
|
1649
|
0.026
|
|
F
|
5404
|
2207
|
|
C12 (ng/mL)
|
M
|
211
|
107
|
0.325
|
|
F
|
244
|
117
|
|
Cmax (ng/mL)
|
M
|
677
|
304
|
0.032
|
|
F
|
918
|
514
|
|
Clw/F(L/h/kg)
|
M
|
0.324
|
0.120
|
0.057
|
|
F
|
0.299
|
0.186
|
|