532
Cumulative Risk of Extensive Triple-class Virologic Failure in 10,603 Patients followed as Long as 10 Years from the Start of ART
Andrew Phillips*1, A Wilson2, C Leen2, and The UK CHIC Study Group
1Royal Free and Univ Coll London Med Sch, UK and 2Western Gen Hosp, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Background: Cohort studies
have provided estimates of the cumulative risk of triple-class failure, defined
as virologic failure of at least 1 drug within each of the 3 current main
classes. However, many with triple-class failure so defined may have nucleoside
options or may not have failed a boosted protease inhibitor (PI). We aimed to
study the cumulative risk of more extensive triple class virologic
failure.
Methods: We studied
patients within the UK CHIC study who started ART with ≥3 drugs.
Virologic failure of a drug was defined as viral load > 400 copies/mL,
despite >4 months of continuous use of the drug. We defined extensive
failure of the nucleoside class as virologic failure of at least 1 drug from
each of the following “sub-classes”:
zidovudine (AZT) and stavudine (d4T); lamivudine (3TC) and emtricitabine
(FTC); and didanosine (ddI), tenofovir (TDF), and abacavir (ABC). Extensive
failure of the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) class was
defined as virologic failure of efavirenz (EFV) or nevirapine (NVP) and
extensive failure of the PI class as virologic failure of at least 1 ritonavir
(RTV) -boosted PI. Extensive
triple-class failure was defined by extensive failure of all 3 classes.
Results: Of the 10,603
patients included, 57% were men who have sex with men (MSM), 38% heterosexual,
25% women; median age 36, CD4 count at start of ART 185/mm3, viral
load 92,000 copies/mL. The table shows the cumulative risk of extensive failure
of individual classes and extensive triple-class failure by years from start of
ART. During 38,190 person-years of
observation, 169 developed extensive triple-class failure (70% of the 169 had
previously experienced at least 1 viral load <50 copies/mL while on ART).
The figure of 8% (95%CI 5.5% to 10.5%) who experienced
extensive triple-class failure by 10 years compares with the equivalent figure
of 20% for triple-class failure. Baseline CD4 <200 /mm3 was
associated with a higher risk of extensive triple-class failure (hazard ratio
2.2; p <0.0001). Among those with
baseline CD4 count >200/mm3, the cumulative risk of extensive
triple-class failure by 10 years was 4% (95%CI 2 to 6%). Among the 169 with extensive triple-class
failure, 95 (56%) subsequently experienced at least 1 viral load <50
copies/mL.
Conclusions: Extensive
virologic failure of the 3 current main classes occurs extremely slowly,
particularly in those starting ART with CD4 count >200/mm3,
and viral suppression despite such a cumulative failure history is common.
These estimates are informative for understanding the risks of exhausting
treatment options and will prove useful for models predicting future need for
new drugs.

|