971 
ART May Reduce but Did Not Eliminate Exposure to Possible Superinfection
Larry Bragg*1, J McConnell1, E Delwart2,3, E Delwart2,3, B Herring2,3, B Herring2,3, C Kreis1, R Grant1,2, and R Grant1,2
1Gladstone Inst of Virology and Immunology, Univ of California, San Francisco, US; 2Univ of California, San Francisco, US; and 3Blood Ctrs of the Pacific, San Francisco, CA, US
Background: Case reports of superinfection have mostly involved recent
seroconverters, in whom the incidence of apparent superinfection is comparable
to the incidence of primary HIV infection. In contrast, apparent superinfection
among chronically infected persons seems to be rare.
Methods: The
Positive Partners study involves prospective follow-up of HIV+, sero-concordant couples in San Francisco. Eligibility was based on
reported unprotected intercourse with HIV+ partners in the past
year. We analyzed pol
and tat population sequences phylogenetically
and calculated expected superinfection incidence based on published infectivity
statistics.
Results: We
followed a cohort of 35 HIV+, seroconcordant
couples with genetically distinguishable viruses at baseline and plasma RNA
levels sufficient for viral sequence analysis. Of the cohort, 90% reported >1
year since HIV diagnosis. In the absence of mechanisms blocking HIV superinfection, we would expect superinfection to occur as
commonly as primary infection given the same exposure. While in follow-up,
individuals reported 6317 episodes of unprotected intercourse with their
enrollment and outside partners; combined with our estimate of exposures with
enrollment partner retrospectively this cohort experienced 20,725 episodes of
unprotected intercourse. Eliminating exposures from partners who had viral
loads <1500 copies/mL reduced the number of
expected superinfections from 21 to 9.5; additionally eliminating all
individuals who were on ART and possibly protected by chemoprophylactic effects
reduced the expected superinfections during observation to 2.85. When adjusted
for infectivity of partner and ART chemoprophylaxis, expected retrospective and
prospective superinfections combined dropped from >80 to nearly 23 and 2.5,
respectively. Adjusting for the protective effects ART may have against
superinfections we would expect to see more than five superinfections from this
cohort. No evidence of superinfection was found.
Conclusions: The incidence
of systemic superinfection is less than expected (0 of 56 person-years) among
these highly exposed couples, even adjusting for ART use and partner infectivity,
which suggests that mechanisms other than treatment, which are not present
during recent infection, are blocking superinfection
in chronically infected individuals. Further research is needed to better
understand these additional mechanisms.
|