663
Tenofovir Resistance among HIV-infected Patients Failing a Fixed-dose Combination of Stavudine + Lamivudine + Nevirapine in a Resource-limited Setting
Somnuek Sungkanuparph*1, W Manosuthi2, S Kiertiburanakul1, B Piyavong1, and W Chantratitra1
1Faculty of Med, Ramathibodi Hosp, Mahidol Univ, Bangkok, Thailand and 2Bamrasnaradura Inst, Ministry of Publ Hlth, Nonthaburi, Thailand
Background: A fixed-dose
combination of stavudine (d4T) + lamivudine (3TC) + nevirapine (NVP) is
extensively used in developing countries secondary to its affordable cost. Treatment
failure from this regimen becomes more common and resistance testing is not
widely accessible. Options for backbone in the second regimen are limited by nucleoside
reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) cross resistance and the cost of
abacavir and didanosine. Tenofovir (TDF) is expected to be available in Thailand
in November 2006 with a low cost. Some mutation patterns after failing d4T+3TC+NVP
may limit the use of tenofovir in the second regimen.
Methods: Genotypic
resistance testing was conducted among HIV-infected patients who failed their initial
ART regimen of a fixed-dose combination of d4T+3TC+NVP during 2003-2005. Patterns
of resistance mutation contributing to tenofovir resistance were studied.
Predicting factors for TDF resistance were determined from univariate and
multivariate analysis.
Results: There were 98 patients with a mean (SD) age
of 35.2 (6.3) years and 63% were male.
Median (IQR) duration of ART was 20 (13 to 28) months. Median (IQR) CD4 cell
count and HIV RNA at the time of virological failure detection was 159 (105 to 248)
cells/mm3 and 4.1 (3.7 to 4.7) log copies/mL, respectively. Of the
total, 10 (10.2%) patients had TDF resistance: 6 had K65R and 4 had ≥3 thymidine
analog mutations (TAM) inclusive of either M41L or L210W. When categorized
patients into 2 groups according to HIV RNA level at virological failure
detection, the group with HIV RNA >4 log copies/mL at failure had a higher rate
of tenofovir resistance when compared to the group with HIV RNA ≤4 log
copies/mL at failure (20% vs 2.3%, p =
0.021). By multivariate analysis, only log HIV RNA at failure (OR 10.48; 95%CI
1.77 to 62.13, p = 0.010) and
duration of ART prior to failure (OR 1.12; 95%CI, 1.03 to 1.21, p = 0.008) predicted the occurrence of tenofovir
resistance.
Conclusions: TDF resistance is common among HIV-infected
patients failing d4T+3TC+NVP regimen and having high HIV RNA at failure. Late detection of virological failure limits the use of
tenofovir in the second regimen for patients
failing d4T+3TC+NVP. In resource-limited settings where resistance
testing is not widely accessible and options for the second regimen are limited,
early detection of virological failure is crucial. Accessibility of HIV RNA
assay for monitoring of treatment needs to be scaled-up along with accesibility
of ART.
|