40
Poly-L-lactic Acid Injections for Facial Lipoatrophy: A Randomized, Multicenter Trial
Dianne Carey*1, D Baker2, N Easey3, K Petoumenos1, S Emery1, J Chuah4, K Machon5, G Rogers6, D Cooper1,3, D Cooper1,3, A Carr3, and for the Facial Lipoatrophy Study in HIV (FLASH) Investigators
1Natl Ctr for HIV Epidemiology and Clin Res, Univ of New South Wales, Australia; 2407 Doctors, Sydney, Australia; 3St Vincent's Hosp, Sydney, Australia; 4Gold Coast Sexual Hlth Clin, Miami, Australia; 5Natl Assn of People with HIV/AIDS, Sydney, Australia; and 6Secretariat of the Pacific Community, Noumea, New Caledonia
Background: Facial lipoatrophy is disfiguring, can
stigmatize, and can affect self-esteem, quality of life, and adherence to ART.
Small studies have found poly-L-lactic
acid injections to have acceptable safety and efficacy over 48 weeks, but no
study was randomized and also included objective endpoints.
Methods: HIV+ adults with moderate/severe
facial lipoatrophy were randomised to 4 open-label poly-L-lactic acid
treatments (5 mL per cheek) every 2 weeks from week 0 (IMM; n = 51), or 4 poly-L-lactic acid
treatments after week 24 (DEF; n =
50). The primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in facial soft tissue
volume (upper limit at mid-orbit; lower limit at angle of mandible) by spiral
computed tomography (CT). The study had 80% power to detect a 25% difference in
change in facial soft tissue volume between groups at week 24 by
intention-to-treat analysis.
Results: Mean changes in facial soft tissue volume at
week 24 were 0 cm3 in the IMM group and –10 cm3 in the
DEF group (between-group difference, 10 cm3 [95%CI –7, +28]; p = 0.24; +3%). Relative to the DEF
group, the IMM group had a significantly greater between-group change in
subcutaneous soft-tissue depth just inferior to the malar bone (2.2 mm; 95%CI
1.6, 2.9; p <0.0001; +19%) and
just superior to the nasolabial folds (1.0 mm; 95%CI, 0.3, 1.6; p = 0.003; +4%), but not in untreated
areas (mid-orbit, p = 0.9; angle of mandible;
p = 0.21). Subjective facial
lipoatrophy severity assessed by patient and physician improved significantly
in IMM participants (p <0.0001).
There was no change in peripheral fat mass (p
= 0.63), total fat mass (p = 0.29),
or lean body mass (p = 0.28) by DEXA.
Poly-L-lactic acid treatment adherence was 99%. Poly-L-lactic
acid treatment did not significantly
impact HIV viral load (p = 0.57), CD4+
count (p = 0.54), or ART adherence (p = 0.70). The most common
procedure/product adverse events were pain or discomfort (any grade, 79%),
edema (66%; ≥25 mm diameter, 29%) and erythema (56%; ≥25 mm
diameter, 22%). Median duration of treatment-related adverse events was 2 (IQR
1 to 3) days. No poly-L-lactic acid–related adverse event was dose-limiting or
delayed treatment. Of 4 severe adverse events reported in 3 subjects, none was
attributed to poly-L-lactic acid.
Conclusions: Although 4 facial injections of poly-L-lactic
acid over 6 weeks in HIV-infected adults with facial lipoatrophy did not
increase facial soft tissue volume overall, but prevented deterioration in
injected areas. Poly-L-lactic acid injections were administered safely and were
well tolerated. Objectively assessed relative increases in cheek subcutaneous
thickness were less than reported in other studies.
|