Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 153 Poster Abstracts
TB and HIV Co-Infection: Detection and Treatment Challenges
Session Day and Time: Wednesday, 1 - 4 pm
Poster Hall


861    
Utility of the ELISpot Assay in the Diagnosis of Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection among HIV-infected Patients with Advanced Immunodeficiency in South Africa
Stephen Lawn*1,2, Stephen Lawn*1,2, N Bangani1, R Wilkinson3,4, R Wilkinson3,4, M Vogt1, M Ntobongwana1, M Badri1, L G Bekker1, and R Wood1
1Desmond Tutu HIV Ctr, Univ of Cape Town, South Africa; 2London Sch of Hygiene and Tropical Med, UK; 3Inst of Infectious Disease and Molecular Med, Univ of Cape Town, South Africa; and 4Wellcome Trust Ctr for Res in Clin Tropical Med, Imperial Coll London, UK

Background. ELISPOT assays incorporating Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens (ESAT-6 and CFP-10) are useful in the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) or latent infection and reflect mycobacterial burden. However, their utility in advanced HIV infection is unknown. We studied determinants of ELISPOT responses among HIV-infected patients without active TB living in a South African community with very high TB incidence.

Methods. Tuberculin skin tests (TSTs) and overnight IFN-γ ELISPOT assays incorporating ESAT-6 and CFP-10 were performed in HIV-infected (HIV+) patients (n=40) and healthy age / sex-matched HIV-negative (HIV-) controls (n=30). Active TB was carefully excluded in all study participants. TST and ELISPOT responses were related to patient characteristics.

Results. Among HIV- controls, TSTs were >10mm and ELISPOT responses were positive among 77% (n=23) and 70% (n=21), respectively. In contrast, among HIV+ patients (median CD4 count=114 cells/μl) only 38% (n=15) had positive ELISPOT responses and 57% had anergic TSTs. However, 48% (n=19) of HIV+ patients had completed treatment for TB within the preceding 3 years; positive ELISPOT responses were far less frequent among those who had received TB treatment than those who had not (11% versus 62%, P<0.001). This strong association remained in multivariate analysis (adjusted OR=0.06, 95%CI=0.10-0.40, P<0.01). ELISPOT responses were, however, independent of CD4 count and viral load. TSTs responses were not associated with CD4 cell count, viral load or history of TB treatment.

Conclusions. ELISPOT responses were independent of CD4 count but had a strong inverse association with history of TB treatment in HIV+ patients. We have formerly reported from this patient population that a history of TB treatment is associated with ~5-fold lower risk of active TB, probably reflecting mycobacterial clearance. Taken together, the results indicate that ELISPOT assays are able to detect viable M. tuberculosis infection in patients with advanced HIV, identifying those at increased risk of active TB. Approximately two-thirds of HIV+ patients who had not previously received TB treatment had ELISPOT responses indicative of M. tuberculosis infection. This assay potentially has great utility both for assessment of individual patients with advanced HIV infection and as an immuno-epidemiological tool in the study of HIV-associated TB.