380
The Relationship between Outcome of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy and Type and Response to ART in Previously HAART-untreated Patients
Annamaria Pazzi*1, L Galli1, P Costenaro1, A Boschini2, S Casari3, C Mussini4, S Gerevini5, S Bossolasco1, A Lazzarin1, and P Cinque1
1San Raffaele Sci Inst, Milan, Italy; 2San Patrignano Med Ctr, Rimini, Italy; 3Hosp Civili, Univ Brescia, Italy; 4Clin of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Modena, Italy; and 5San Raffaele Sci Inst, Milano, Italy
Background: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML)
is still associated with high mortality despite the use of HAART. It is not
clear whether poor PML outcome is associated with failure to respond to HAART,
HAART-induced immune reconstitution, or both. To address this question, we
investigated the relationship of PML survival with type and response to HAART
in a selected group of patients who started HAART after PML diagnosis.
Methods: We evaluated 48 patients with PML diagnosed
between 1996 and 2006 (confirmed by brain biopsy or JC virus [JCV] DNA in CSF =
42; probable, based on typical clinical and neuroimaging findings = 6) who were
either ART naive (n = 28), ART
untreated for ≥6 months (n = 11)
or taking 1 or 2 nucleoside analogs at onset of PML (n = 9). Patients started HAART 42 (14 to 42) (median [IQR]) days
following PML onset (baseline). Survival curves (Kaplan-Meier method) were
estimated according to PML onset variables (age, sex, CD4 and CD8 cell counts
and percentage, CD4/CD8 ratio, plasma and CSF HIV RNA level, CSF JCV DNA level,
HCV antibody status) and during follow-up (3 months after PML onset, use of protease
inhibitor, changes in CD4 and CD8 cell counts and percentage, CD4/CD8 ratio,
and plasma HIV RNA level). In this analysis, quantitative variables were
stratified according to their median values. Multivariate analysis (Cox model)
was performed including as covariates the baseline values of CD4 (< vs
≥86/µL), CD4% (< vs ≥10.5), CD8 (< vs ≥ 630/µL), CD8%
(< vs ≥ 62.3), viral load (< vs ≥140,000 copies/mL), and protease
inhibitor use (yes vs no). Because all PML-related deaths occurred within 18
months from PML onset, all the variables were correlated to the 2-year
survival.
Results: Survival from onset of PML was 59% at 2 years
and 34% at 8.7 years. The 2-year survival probability was lower in patients
with baseline CD4% <10.5 (28% vs 75%, p
= 0.04). Higher survival was associated with larger increases in both CD4 cell
counts (92% vs 50% for ≥ vs <32/µL, p = 0.012) and CD4% (100% vs 62% for ≥ vs <3.25%, p = 0.010), respectively, at 3 months
compared to baseline. No association was found with the other variables either
considered at baseline or during follow-up. At multivariate analysis only protease
inhibitor turned out to independently reduce the risk of mortality at 2 years
(HR = 0.410, 95%CI = 0.165 to 1.017, p
= 0.041), whereas baseline CD4% <10.5 was associated with higher risk
showing a trend toward significance (HR = 2.978, 95%CI = 0.927 to 9.568, p = 0.066).
Conclusions: These findings indicate that favorable PML
outcome is mostly associated with good response to HAART. Use of protease
inhibitor in combination regimens might influence this effect.
|