Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 103 Poster Abstracts
Clinical Pharmacology in Adults and Children: Issues of Relevance for Developing Countries
Session Day and Time: Monday, 1 - 4 pm
Poster Hall


579
Reduced Lopinavir Exposure during Pregnancy: A Case Control Study
Gilles Peytavin*1, S Pierre-François2, B Cassard1, P de Truchis3, C Winter4, B Visseaux1, F Damond1, R Tubiana5, L Mandelbrot6, and S Matheron1
1Hosp Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France; 2Zobda Quitman Hosp, Fort de France, France; 3Hosp Raymond Poincare, Garches, France; 4Hosp Montreuil, France; 5Hosp Pitie-Salpetriere, Paris, France; and 6Hosp L Mourier, Colombes, France

Background:  ART in HIV-infected pregnant women is primarily indicated to prevent HIV vertical transmission and is stopped after delivery in most cases. Therefore, the effect of the physiological changes associated with pregnancy on drug pharmacokinetics is difficult to assess in a pharmacokinetic ante- and post-partum comparison. Our objective was to describe lopinavir (LPV) plasma concentrations and virological outcomes in HIV-infected pregnant women.

Methods:  This was a prospective, multi-center case/control study enrolling 100 consecutive HIV-infected pregnant women who received LPV/ritonavir (r or RTV) 400/100 mg twice dialy and 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI). CD4 cell count and plasma HIV RNA (median, IQR 25 to 75) were available at delivery. LPV Cmin was determined using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with photodiode array-ultraviolet (PDA-UV) detection (limit of quantitation 30 ng/mL) during the second or third trimester. LPV Cmin were matched to results of non-pregnant women (control group) according to age, stable LPV/r 400/100 mg twice daily treatment and plasma viral load <200 copies/mL at the time of pharmacokinetic assay. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann Whitney and spearman tests.

Results:  We enrolled 101 pregnant women (aged 32 years, 28 to 35). At delivery, CD4 counts were 416/mm3 (334 to 529) and plasma viral load <200 copies/mL in 85%. At second and third trimester, LPV Cmin were 3806 ng/mL (2765 to 5640; n = 27) and 3274 ng/mL (1792 to 4501; n = 74), respectively (p = 0.055). No drug adjustments were performed in these patients. LPV Cmin at second and third trimester were statistically correlated to plasma viral load at delivery (p = 0.0005). There was also a statistical correlation between LPV and RTV Cmin. In patients with plasma viral load <200 copies/mL, LPV Cmin was statistically higher in the control group (5122 ng/mL; 3440 to 7496; n = 107) than at second and third trimester in pregnant patients (p = 0.03 and p <0.0001).

Conclusions:  LPV exposure during pregnancy is lower than in non-pregnant women, particularly during the third trimester. Inadequate viral suppression observed at delivery may be predicted by low LPV Cmin. In such cases, a dose increase of LPV/r should be proposed in these patients.