611
Development of VircoTYPE HIV-1 Resistance Analysis including Clinical Cutoffs for Ritonavir-boosted Atazanavir and Fosamprenavir
Bart Winters*1, J Montaner2, R Harrigan2, I Pellegrin3, M Tisdale4, D Seekins5, D Butcher5, J Villacian1, E Van Craenenbroeck1, and L Bacheler6
1Virco BVBA, Mechelen, Belgium; 2BC Ctr for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada; 3Ctr Hosp Univ de Bordeaux, Univ Victor Segalen, France; 4GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, UK; 5Bristol-Myers Squibb, Plainsboro, NJ, US; and 6VircoLab, Inc, Durham NC, US
Background: Quantitative
phenotypic resistance information interpreted via clinical cut-offs can
facilitate optimization of combination antiretroviral therapy. Virtual
phenotype-LM (Linear Model) predictions of atazanavir (ATV) and fos-amprenavir (fAPV) drug
susceptibility and clinical cut-offs are described.
Methods: Based on
clinical isolates with both drug-susceptibility phenotypes (Antivirogram)
and viral genotypes, linear regression models were developed to predict ATV or amprenavir (APV) fold change in IC50 from the
viral genotype (Virtual phenotype-LM). Using treatment response data from
clinical trials and cohorts, separate linear regression models were developed
to predict 8-week change in viral load for regimens including ritonavir-boosted ATV (ATV/r) or fos-amprenavir
(fAPV/r) as a function of baseline viral load,
protease inhibitor (PI) fold change, activity of the background regimen, enfuvirtide (T-20) use, and, for ATV, concomitant tenofovir (TDF) use. We defined 2 clinical cut-offs,
corresponding to predicted fold change values associated with a 20% or 80% loss
of the boosted PI response of subjects infected with wild type strains.
Results: Virtual
phenotype-LM predictions of ATV and APV fold change weigh the contributions of
multiple protease gene mutations and mutation pairs, and provide an
accurate prediction of the measured fold change (R = 0.94, n >15,000
for ATV; 0.92, n ≥43,000 for
APV). Virtual phenotype-LM predicted
resistance ranged from 0.8-fold change for wild type isolates to 78.2-fold
change for ATV and 38.5-fold change for APV.
We observed 20% (clinical cut-off 1) and 80% (clinical cut-off 2) loss
of the predicted boosted-PI response in treated patients at 2.7 and 32.9 ATV fold
change and at 1.3 and 11.4 APV fold change. In the analysis datasets, patients
receiving ATV/r-based regimens with baseline ATV fold change smaller than
clinical cut-off 1 (n = 216), between
clinical cut-off 1 and clinical cut-off 2 (n
= 31), and larger than clinical cut-off 2 (n = 11) had median viral load reductions of –2.0, –1.1, and –0.25
log10 HIV RNA at 8 weeks, respectively. Patients receiving FPV/r-based
regimens with baseline APV fold change less than clinical cut-off 1 (n = 69), between clinical cut-off 1 and clinical
cut-off 2 (n = 47), and more than clinical cut-off 2 (n = 20) had median 8-week reductions in viral load from baseline of
–1.77, –0.75, and –0.20 log10 HIV RNA.
Conclusions: We have integrated
complex interactions among multiple protease gene mutations to provide accurate
quantitative predictions of ATV and fAPV
susceptibility, which can be interpreted utilizing drug-specific clinical
cut-offs.
|