253 
HIV Envelope Functional Evolution during Co-receptor Switching
Donald Mosier*1, R Nedellec1, A Ramos1, J Miamidian2, J Reeves3, and C Pastore1
1Scripps Res Inst, La Jolla, CA, US; 2Univ of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, US; and 3Monogram Biosci, South San Francisco, CA, US
Background: HIV-1 co-receptor switching involves envelope
mutations that usually result in R5 to R5X4 to X4 transitions. We have examined
the functional consequences of envelope mutations in 4 distinct switching
pathways resulting in viruses with co-receptor preference ranging from R5
>X4, R5 = X4, X4 >R5, to pure X4 to determine common and distinct
features of each pathway.
Methods: Site-directed mutagenesis was used to
introduce most combinations of mutations in envelope previously shown to
generate R5X4 or X4 variants of BaL
or ADA isolates. For all combinations of mutations preserving infectivity on
either CCR5- or CXCR4-expressing target cells, we determined the sensitivity of
the resulting envelope mutant to co-receptor inhibitors, soluble CD4, and the
broadly neutralizing antibodies b12-IgG and 4E10.
Results: Common features of Env
mutations involved in co-receptor switching were decreased CCR5 binding,
increased sensitivity to CCR5 inhibitors, and increased resistance to soluble
CD4 that was confirmed by direct binding assays. Increased binding to CD4
preceded measurable increases in CXCR4 binding and increased resistance to
CXCR4 inhibitors. Unique features of different co-receptor switch intermediates
included varying sensitivity to antibody neutralization and the fraction of
mutated envelopes with loss of entry function. Infection of CXCR4-expressing
target cells was more sensitive to antibody neutralization than infection of
CCR5-expressing target cells.
Conclusions: Increased CD4 binding and decreased CCR5
binding are common features of co-receptor switch intermediates, even when the
final virus utilizes CCR5 more efficiently than the parental R5 isolate.
Increased CD4 binding may provide enough fitness advantage to allow survival of
intermediates with poor binding to both CCR5 and CXCR4. Neutralizing antibody
may slow the emergence of R5X4 or X4 variants.
|