Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 76 Poster Abstracts
Neurocognitive Dysfunction: Immunologic Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and CNS Drug Penetration
Session Day and Time: Monday, 1 - 4 pm
Poster Hall


384    
Clinical Evidence of Antiviral Activity of Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors in the Central Nervous System
Scott Letendre*1, J Marquie-Beck1, D Clifford2, A Collier3, B Gelman4, J McArthur5, J McCutchan1, D Simpson6, I Grant1, R Ellis1, and CHARTER Group
1Univ of California, San Diego, US; 2Washington Univ, St Louis, MO, US; 3Univ of Washington, Seattle, US; 4Univ of Texas Med Branch, Galveston, US; 5Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD, US; and 6Mt Sinai Sch of Med, New York, NY, US

Background:  ART has reduced the incidence of HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment, but its prevalence remains high. Clinical trials have yet to identify a consistently effective treatment for HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment, other than ART, but in vitro data support that some drugs approved by the FDA for other indications might benefit individuals with HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment. Some of these drugs, such as serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRI) and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), may do so by reducing HIV replication in the central nervous system.

Methods:  A baseline assessment for 658 HIV-infected participants of the CHARTER study, a North American observational cohort, included comprehensive neuropsychological testing and HIV RNA measurements in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF):  467 (71%) used ART, 195 (30%) used SRI, and 63 (10%) used statins.

Results:  SRI users were less likely to have HIV RNA levels >50 copies/mL in CSF (29% vs 37% in non-SRI users, OR 0.69, p = 0.05). This association was most evident for 3 of the 7 SRI (citalopram, sertraline, and trazodone, or “antiviral” SRI, combined 25% vs 38% in non-SRI users, OR 0.56, p = 0.01) and was limited to those not taking concomitant ART (61% vs 83%, OR 0.31, p = 0.01). “Antiviral” SRI users also performed better on neuropsychological tests (median global deficit score 0.37 vs 0.47, p = 0.04). Statin users were also less likely to have HIV RNA levels in CSF >50 copies/mL (16% vs 37%, p <0.001). In contrast to SRI, statins showed the strongest association in those using ART (2% vs 18%, p <0.001). Statin use was not associated with better neuropsychological performance. Multivariate analyses indicated that use of “antiviral” SRI—but not statins—was associated with undetectable HIV RNA levels in CSF and better neuropsychological performance after adjusting for HIV RNA levels in plasma, ART use, AIDS diagnosis, and current CD4 count.

Conclusions:  SRI may both reduce HIV replication in CSF and improve neuropsychological performance. This was particularly true for 3 SRI in this analysis—supporting differences in antiviral efficacy between drugs—and in those not taking ART. In contrast, statins were not associated with lower HIV replication in CSF in multivariate analyses and were not associated with better neuropsychological performance. These analyses support further investigation of SRI as adjunctive treatment for the neurologic complications of HIV.