473 
Investigation of HIV-1 Inactivation by Non-neutralizing Antibodies
S Campbell1, R Center1, A Schöenberner1, A Wheatley1, J Howard1, A Kelleher2, B Loveland3, and Damian Purcell*1
1Univ of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; 2Natl Ctr for HIV Epidemiology and Clin Res, Darlinghurst, Australia; and 3Austin Res Inst, Heidelberg, Australia
Background: Neutralizing antibodies to HIV-1 inhibit
infection by physically blocking the interaction of surface envelope proteins
with target cell receptors or by preventing viral fusion. However, non-neutralizing antibodies against HIV
predominate after vaccination or infection. The value of non-neutralizing
antibodies in preventing infection by opsonisation, antibody-directed
cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and activation of the complement (C’) cascade
leading to lysis of virions or infected cells warrants further investigation as
primary transmitting HIV-1 strains and plasma HIV-1 are sensitive to
C’-mediated lysis.
Methods: In concert with our effort to identify and
deliver HIV envelope immunogens that elicit a strong neutralizing antibody
response in small animal models, we have developed a pseudoviral,
enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) reporter-based neutralizing antibody
assay. A panel of pseudoviruses were generated by co-transfection of an env-deleted proviral DNA with the egfp gene fused into the nef frame and exchangeable viral
envelope protein expression vectors. Pseudovirus
infection of target cells generated EGFP that was quantified by FACS analysis.
Results: We used pseudovirus
to measure susceptibility to C’ and mimic plasma-derived virus for the
detection of non-neutralising, yet virus-inactivating, antibodies. We
incorporated a source of active human C’ to trigger C’-mediated virus
neutralisation. We also inactivated pseudovirion-associated
complement inhibitory proteins (CIP) by various means, such as phospholipase C
treatment to remove the CIP, CD55, and CD59. Upon disablement of the C’
inhibitory activity of CD55 by antibody, we observed virus neutralization,
whereas an alternate CD55-specific antibody that does not inhibit CD55
activity, unexpectedly, led to an enhancement of virus infection. We also
observed enhancement of infection contributed by non-C’ serum factor(s).
Conclusions: Assays using pseudovirus-reporters
demonstrated both beneficial and undesirable effects of non-neutralizing
antibodies, such as enhancement of infection. Our data highlights the
importance of the alternate protective functions of antibodies, especially in
light of the extreme difficulty in eliciting useful neutralising antibody
responses with current experimental vaccines. We are currently investigating
the evolution of these antibody activities during acute HIV-1 infection.
|