789 
Antiretroviral-assocated Drug Toxicities Leading to a Switch in Medication: Experience in Uganda, Kenya, and Zambia
Anthony Amoroso*, R Sheneberger, A Edozien, J Fielder, M Etienne, and K Stafford
Univ of Maryland Sch of Med, Baltimore, US
Background: AIDSRelief is a care
and treatment program supported by the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS
Relief working in 9 countries. The program started treatment of patients with ART
in August 2004. Recorded for quality assurance and evaluation are outcomes data,
including mortality, lost to follow-up, and ART-associated
toxicity leading to a change in treatment. Here we report the ART-associated
toxicity reported between August 2004 and June 1, 2006, for 6520 treated
patients in Kenya, Zambia, and Uganda.
Methods: A standardized medical record format is used in
the 3 countries. Only drug-associated toxicities leading to a clinical decision
to change an ART medication are recorded within the medical record and
subsequently abstracted into CareWare electronic
database. All providers have access to basic chemistry assays, including creatinine, amylase, aminotransferasem
alanine aminotransferase, hematocrit or hemoglobin, triglycerides, and blood glucose.
The frequencies of associated toxicities were aggregated across the 3 countries
regardless of the drug with which the regimen was combined.
Results: A total of 1007 patients experienced a toxicity that
resulted in a drug switch. Of 2149
patient treated with stavudine (d4T), 24% switched because
of an associated toxicity, including neuropathy, lipoatrophy,
pancreatitis, or lactic acidosis. Of the 1433
patients treated with zidovudine (AZT), 12% switched because
of anemia or gastrointestinal intolerance. Of the 2938 treated with tenofovir (TDF), 0.6% switched because of renal
insufficiency. Of the 4288 patients treated with nevirapine
(NVP), 5% switched because of rash or hepatic toxicity. Of the 3657 patients
treated with efavirenz (EFV), 2% switched because of
central nervous system intolerance, rash, or hepatic toxicity. Of the 622
patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r),
1.3% switched because of metabolic abnormalities, liver toxicity, or diarrhea.
Conclusions: Toxicities reported in our program are similar to other
published reports in Africa. The comparably
low toxicity rates of TDF and EFV support the preferential use of these agents
for a “public health” approach over the current predominately used agents.
Limitations of the study include an underestimation of toxicities and reliance
on provider diagnosis and discretion to change therapy.
|