136LB
The Anti-Hepatitis B Drug Entecavir Inhibits HIV-1 Replication and Selects HIV-1 Variants Resistant to Antiretroviral Drugs
M McMahon1, B Jilek1, T Brennan1, L Shen1, Y Zhou1, S Bhat1, B Hale2, R Hegarty1, R Silicano1, and Chloe Thio*1
1Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD, US and 2Naval Med Ctr
Background: Entecavir,
an analogue of 2’-deoxyguanosine, is approved by the FDA for the treatment of
chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV). The package insert states that entecavir has
no clinically relevant activity against HIV. We became aware of 2 HIV/HBV co-infected
patients on entecavir monotherapy who had a 1-log decline in their HIV RNA.
Thus, we tested the hypothesis that entecavir has clinically relevant activity
against HIV.
Methods: Dose/response
curves for inhibition of HIV infection were generated in vitro using a precise infectivity assay. HIV pseudoviruses
carrying pol gene sequences from either a reference or a patient-derived
HIV isolate were used to infect CD4+ lymphoblasts in the presence of
increasing concentrations of antiviral drugs. To assess development of
resistance mutations, HIV RNA was extracted from an HIV-HBV co-infected patient
at several time points while on entecavir monotherapy, amplified via RT-PCR,
cloned and sequenced. Finally, a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay was used
to determine reverse transcriptase activity in the presence of entecavir.
Results: We found
that entecavir potently inhibited HIV replication with an IC50
between 0.1 and 1 nM. This IC50 is below the plasma concentrations
achieved in vivo at doses given for
hepatitis B and is 100- to 1000-fold lower than the IC50 of
zidovudine in the same system. The prospective analysis of our patient samples
demonstrated accumulation of the M184V mutation with 0%, 61%, and 96% of the
clones harboring this variant at the start of entecavir, and at 4 and 6 months
after entecavir, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis of these M184V clones was
consistent with selection for the mutation on entecavir. Both the laboratory
and patient-derived strains with the M184V were resistant to entecavir. Using
real-time PCR, we found that entecavir decreased the level of early,
intermediate, and late reverse transcripts suggesting that it inhibits HIV
replication at or before the reverse transcription step.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates
that entecavir is a potent (but partial) inhibitor of HIV replication in
vivo and in vitro and that it can select for viruses bearing the
M184V mutation, which confers high-level resistance to entecavir. These data
have important implications for treatment of hepatitis B in HIV-infected
patients since they indicate that current guidelines recommending entecavir as
the first line treatment in co-infected persons who do not require anti-HIV
therapy should be reconsidered.
|