Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 38 Oral Abstracts
Primary HIV Infection, Early Treatment, and Immune-Based Therapies for Chronic Infection
Session Day and Time: Wednesday, 10 am - 12:30 pm
Presentation Time: 11:15 am
Room: Room 408


125LB
No Benefit from Early Treatment in Primary HIV-Infection?
Christine Koegl*1, E Wolf1, H Jessen2, K Schewe3, M Rausch4, J Goelz5, A Goetzenich6, H Knechten6, H Jaeger7, and the Prime-DAG and Ac-DAG Study Group
1MUC Res, Munich, Germany; 2Private Practice, Berlin, Germany; 3Practice St Georg, Hamburg, Germany; 4Priviate Practice, Berlin, Germany; 5HIV Outpatient Practice Kaiserdamm, Berlin, Germany; 6DAGNAE eV, Aachen, Germany; and 7HIV Res and Clin Care Ctr Munich, Germany

Background:  The scientific data on an optimal management of primary HIV-infection are inconclusive. There is only poor evidence that early treatment of primary/acute HIV infection can reduce the viral load set point or improve cellular immune functions.

Methods:  We subjected 2 national cohorts to prospective analysis:  Prime-DAG started in July 2001 with a focus on early treatment, and Ac-DAG started in January 2003 with a focus on non-treatment of primary HIV-infection. Criteria for primary HIV infection were either a negative ELISA coupled with a positive viral load, or a documented Western blot with <5 bands. CD4 cell counts and viral load in untreated patients 12 months after seroconversion were compared with treated patients 12 months after treatment stop.

Results:  We included 200 cases (191 male) of primary HIV-infection. In 144 patients, treatment was started immediately, while 56 patients remained untreated. In patients without treatment, the median first measured viral load was 240,000 copies/mL vs 500,001 copies/mL in patients initiating treatment (p <0.001). The median CD4 counts were 629/µL and 453/µL, respectively (p = 0.001). Of 144 treated patients, 100 stopped treatment after a median time of 9.5 months. At this time point, viral load was below detection in 82% of these patients (range, <49 to 7220 copies/mL). The median CD4 count was 799/µL; 12 months after treatment stop (n = 44), the median viral load was 38,056 copies/mL (range, <49 to 492,000 copies/mL). In 2 patients, viral load was still below detection. The median CD4 count was 538/µL (range, 183 to 1138 µL). There was a median CD4 increase of +60/µL in comparison to the first CD4 cell count (baseline). In untreated patients (n = 37), the median viral load was 52,880 copies/mL (range, 150 to 1,600,000 copies/mL) and the median antibodies. CD4 count was 525/µL (range, 90 to 1057/µL) 12 months after seroconversion. Untreated patients had a median CD4 decrease of –87/µL in comparison to the first CD4 cell count (baseline, p = 0.01).

Conclusions:  In this relatively large cohort of acute, primary infected HIV patients, early treatment did not change the viral load set point. However, there was an advantage with regard to immune function:  12 months after seroconversion a median CD4 decrease of –87/µL was observed in untreated patients. In treated patients, 12 months after stopping treatment, CD4 cell count was still increased by +60 µL compared with seroconversion.