62
Outcomes of ART in Resource-limited and Industrialized Countries
Matthias Egger
Univ of Berne, Switzerland
Background: Since 1996, the introduction of ART has
substantially improved the prognosis of HIV-infected patients who have access
to these drugs. In recent years, ART has been scaled-up in resource-limited
countries in Africa and Asia, where the
majority of people with HIV/AIDS live. The WHO estimates that, as of June 2006,
an estimated 1.65 million were receiving treatment in low- and middle-income
countries, representing around 24% of the estimated 6.8 million people in need
of treatment. We wanted to describe the characteristics of patients starting
ART in resource-limited and industrialized settings and compare outcomes of
ART, including virologic and immunologic response, treatment change, and
clinical endpoints.
Methods: Data from treatment programs of adults and children,
mainly in Sub-Saharan Africa, which are part of the ART in Lower Income
Countries collaboration (ART-LINC) of the International epidemiological
Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) initiative will be analyzed, including, for
example, the Khayelitsha and Gugulethu programs in 2 townships in South Africa,
and the Academic Model for Prevention and Treatment of HIV/AIDS (AMPATH)
program in Kenya.
Results: Results will be compared with data from
collaborative studies from North America and Europe,
including the ART Cohort Collaboration (ART-CC) and the European Collaborative
study.
Conclusions: This presentation will describe and compare relevant
outcomes of ART in resource-limited and industrialized settings, and discuss
pertinent issues, including, for example, the cost of starting treatment late.
|