64
Endogenous Retroviruses of Mammalian Genomes: Molecular Biology and Roles in Physiology and Physiopathology
Thierry Heidmann
Inst Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
Background: Endogenous retroviruses (ERV) are present in all higher
eukaryotes, where they represent a large fraction of the genomes (8% in humans,
divided into about 100 families). They are remnants of ancestral infections by
bona fide retroviruses that have infected the germline and have thereafter been
transmitted in a Mendelian manner. Conversely, they are a reservoir from which
new infectious retroviruses can arise via recombination. The similarity between
ERV and present-day infectious retroviruses is remarkable, in terms of genome
organization, encoded proteins (with even a functional homolog of the HIV Rev
protein for the HERV-K family), structures of the virus-like particles, and to
some extent replicative cycles (albeit in a few cases strictly intracellular).
Some ERV genes are likely to play a physiological role, associated with the
cell–cell fusogenic activity of their encoded envelope proteins: in both primates and rodents 2 such genes
(so-called syncytins) have been co-opted by the host—and conserved over >30
millions years of evolution—for a role in placentation and syncytiotrophoblast
formation. Yet, as a rule, ERV are silent, due to cellular repression
mechanisms, preventing deleterious insertional mutagenesis: these include chromatin alteration (eg, CpG methylation), homology-dependent
gene silencing, RNA interference, and cytosine deaminase activity of cellular
APOBEC proteins, which also restrict present-day infectious retroviruses.
However, in a few cases (essentially in tumors), ERV become transcriptionally
active and, as such, are likely to produce effects similar to those triggered
by exogenous infectious retroviruses: these
effects include insertional mutagenesis, and direct effects of the viral
proteins themselves, especially the envelope protein, which exerts
immunosuppressive activity. In this respect, we have shown in model mouse
tumors (melanoma, neuroblastoma) that the latter
effect contributes to tumor cell growth, via inhibition of tumor immune
surveillance.
Conclusions: Although
most ERV are defective, due to genetic drift, the molecular biology of
functional elements that could be identified in the human and murine genomes
will be presented. Overall lessons that ERV teach us on the pathological
mechanisms of infectious retroviruses—and vice versa—will be discussed.
|