811 
Indicators of the Use of Healthcare Interventions across Europe
Daria Podlekareva*1, J Reekie2, A Rakhmanova3, A Horban4, A Mocroft2, I Karpov5, P Domingo6, F Antunes7, O Kirk1, J Lundgren1, and EuroSIDA study group
1Copenhagen HIV Prgm, Univ of Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Royal Free and Univ Coll Med Sch, London, UK; 3Botkin Hosp of Infectious Diseases, St Petersburg, Russia; 4Wojewodzki Szpital Zakazny, Warsaw, Poland; 5Belarus State Med Univ, Minsk; 6Hosp de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; and 7Hosp Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal
Background: State-of-the-art care of HIV-infected
persons requires the utilisation of multiple healthcare interventions. We
assessed various indicators of healthcare interventions aimed at improving
patient health across Europe.
Methods: Healthcare interventions were assessed in
EuroSIDA patients enrolled from 2001 onward. We assessed compliance with
current guidelines on when to start ART (percentage of those with CD4 count
<250 cells/µL at study entry who were not on ART); laboratory evaluation of
HIV disease status (median number of CD4 count and HIV RNA measurements
performed /patient/year); ability to identify precise AIDS diagnosis (percentage
of AIDS cases diagnosed as “wasting”); mean percentage of time suppressed; percentage
with >95% of time suppressed, and odds ratio (OR) of >95% of time
being maximally suppressed adjusted for confounders. Follow-up after starting
cART was limited to time on cART. The first 4 months after starting or changing
cART were excluded from analysis and the percentage time suppressed was
calculated as the percentage of time on cART with viral load ≤500
copies/mL.
Results: We included 5607 patients: East (EE, n
= 1236), East Central (EC, n = 964), West Central (WC, n = 992),
North (NE, n = 619), and South (SE, n = 1796). There were some
differences in demographics (see the table). The table also summarizes healthcare
interventions. A high proportion of patients from EE had a low CD4 count and
who had not started ART. HIV RNA was generally measured with less frequency in
EE, whereas the differences in frequency of CD4 measurement were not so
pronounced. The mean percentage of time suppressed was highest in NE. After
adjustment, compared with EE, patients from EC, WC, and NE had significantly
increased OR >95% time on ART suppressed. Other factors associated with an
OR >95% were using a NNRTI-based regimen (OR = 1.5; 95%CI 1.2 to 1.9), being
ART-naive when starting ART (1.7; 1.4 to 2.0), being older (1.1; 1.0 to 1.2),
starting ART more recently (1.2; 1.2 to 1.3), and having lower HIV RNA levels
at starting ART (0.4/log10 higher; 0.4 to 0.5). The percentage of
AIDS cases diagnosed as HIV wasting was not significantly different across
regions (p = 0.06).
Conclusions: Indicators of healthcare interventions
vary across the European continent. There is a need for concerted action to
improve this situation, including securing access to ART for those where
therapy is indicated, improvement in laboratory assessment of HIV disease
status, and ability to maintain maximum virologic suppression. The situation in
Europe can be used to measure healthcare interventions in other settings. 
|