125
Utility of Routine Viral Load, CD4 Cell Count, and Clinical Monitoring among HIV-infected Adults in Uganda: A Randomized Trial
Alex Coutinho*1, J Mermin2,3, J Ekwaru2, W Were2, R Bunnell2,3, F Kaharuza2, L Alexander2, P Solberg2, J Tappero2, and D Moore2,4
1TASO and Infectious Disease Inst, Kampala, Uganda; 2CDC Uganda, Entebbe; 3CDC Kenya, Nairobi; and 4Univ of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Background: Due to financial and infrastructure
considerations, many providers in resource-limited settings do not use routine
viral loads or CD4 cell counts to monitor ART. We evaluated the utility of
routine laboratory monitoring in rural Uganda.
Methods: HIV-infected adults with a CD4 count of
<250 cells/mm3 or World Health Organization (WHO) stage 3 or 4
were offered ART and randomized to 1 of 3 monitoring groups: arm A) clinical
monitoring and quarterly CD4 cell counts and viral loads; arm B) clinical
monitoring and quarterly CD4 cell counts; or arm C) clinical monitoring alone.
Trained lay providers delivered ART to participants’ homes weekly, collected
data on illness and mortality, and referred participants to the study clinic
for care. Quarterly CD4 cell counts and viral loads were done on all
participants; however, results were provided to clinicians per study arm
protocol. Cox proportional hazards and Poisson regression models were used to
compare incidence of new AIDS-defining events and mortality across arms.
Results: In all, 1094 ART-naïve participants
started ART; median baseline CD4 cell count was 130 cells/μL. Median
follow-up was 3 years. From the time of randomization, there were 125 deaths
(11%) and 148 new AIDS-defining illnesses; 66 deaths (52%) occurred >90 days
after starting ART. Virologic failure defined as 2 consecutive viral loads
greater than 500 copies/mL after the first 6 months of ART, was experienced by
61 (6%) of participants. A change to second line drugs occurred in 28 (3%) of
participants. In an intention-to-treat analysis from the date of ART
initiation, adjusting for age, sex, baseline CD4-cell count, viral load, body
mass index, and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD) score,
the rate to new AIDS-defining event or death was higher in arm C than arm A
(hazard ratio [HR] 1.9, p = 0.002) or B (HR 1.5, p = 0.047). No
difference between arms B and A (HR 1.3, p = 0.26) was found; we had 80%
power to detect a rate ratio as small as 1.75 at p <0.05. Although
overall mortality in Arm C during the 3 years of ART was low (13%), there was a
non-significant trend towards higher mortality between arm C and Arms A (HR
1.6, p = 0.07) and B (HR 1.4, p = 0.18). There was no difference
in mortality between arms B and A (HR 1.1, p = 0.6).
Conclusions: The use of routine CD4 cell count
monitoring was associated with fewer new AIDS-defining events or mortality
compared with clinical monitoring alone. These data support WHO guidelines
prioritizing access to CD4 cell count measurements.
|