612 
Benefits of Routine HIV Screening in Sick Children in Nigeria
L Lu1, Omotayo Bolu*1, C Omeogu2, A Abutu3, C Nwude3, R Akpan3, K Bond3, E Ngige4, C Y Ou1, and J Vertefeuille2
1CDC, Atlanta, GA, US; 2USAID, Abuja, Nigeria; 3Global AIDS Prgm, CDC Nigeria, Abuja; and 4Federal Ministry of Hlth, Abuja, Nigeria
Background: In Nigeria, routine screening of
children for HIV-exposure and infection in health care settings is not standard
care. Because overall HIV prevalence in Nigeria is low (4%) compared to other
African settings, the benefit of routine testing outside of antenatal clinics
with prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) services is unclear.
Methods: During a 6-month demonstration project,
early infant diagnostic testing using DNA PCR on dried blood spots (DBS) was
instituted at 6 health facilities in Lagos. HIV-exposed infants (6 weeks to 18
months of age) were identified for early infant diagnostic services by referral
from PMTCT programs. Sick infants with signs and symptoms of HIV or whose
mother’s status was unknown were also screened with rapid antibody tests and,
if found positive (i.e. HIV-exposed), DBS polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
testing was done to confirm diagnosis. For each HIV-exposed child tested by DNA
PCR, information was recorded on: where the child was seen, reason for the
visit, current clinical signs and symptoms of HIV, and PMTCT interventions
received.
Results: Of the first 255 HIV-exposed infants with
available DNA PCR results, 54 (21.2%) were found to be HIV-infected. Of these, 33
(61%) were sick children seeking care for illness. When results were stratified
by site, 44 (83%) infected infants came from 2 facilities, both of which tested
higher numbers of sick children. Of 59 sick outpatients, and 8 pediatric
inpatients tested, 27 (45.8%) and 6 (75.0%) were diagnosed as HIV-infected,
respectively. HIV infection was significantly associated with the child’s point
of entry for services (p <0.05), facility (p <0.001),
reason for the child’s visit (p <0.001), and the number of clinical
signs and symptoms of HIV noted for the child (p <0.001).
Conclusions: We found high rates of HIV infection
among sick infants presenting with symptoms of HIV who may not have been
identified as HIV-exposed until they were screened by rapid antibody testing. More
than half the children found to be HIV-infected in our sample were from 1
health facility that offers routine HIV testing to all sick children. Even in
relatively low-prevalence settings, sick children with signs and symptoms
consistent with HIV should have diagnostic HIV testing. A policy of routinely
offering screening to determine HIV exposure and subsequent HIV testing for all
sick children can effectively identify those who would benefit from ongoing
follow-up and interventions such as cotrimoxazole prophylaxis, infant feeding
support, and ART.
|