385 
Intracerebral Penetrating ART Are More Efficient on Survival of HIV+ Patients with Progressive Multifocal Leucoencephalopathy (ANRS CO4 - FHDH)
Jacques Gasnault*1, E Lanoy2,3, M Bentata4, M Guiguet2,3, and D Costagliola2,3
1Hosp Bicetre, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France; 2INSERM U720, Paris, France; 3Univ Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France; and 4Hosp Avicenne, Bobigny, France
Background: In the last decade, combination ART (cART) has greatly improved
survival of HIV+ patients with progressive multifocal
leucoencephalopathy (PML) by restoring specific immune response to JC virus
(JCV), the causative agent of PML. Moreover, the HIV Tat protein is suspected
to promote JCV replication in glial cells through direct or indirect pathways. We
aimed to examine the relationship between survival on antiretroviral drugs (ARV)
of HIV+ patients with PML and ARV penetration into the central nervous
system (CNS).
Methods: From
the French Hospital Database on HIV (FHDH), a large prospective hospital
cohort, we assessed the impact of the ARV penetration into the CNS on survival
after a PML diagnosis using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models for
mortality adjusted on: age, AIDS stage before diagnosis, CD4 cells count nadir,
geographical origin, sex, exposure group, and calendar periods (pre-cART period—1992
to 1995; and 3 cART periods—1996 to 1998, 1999 to 2002, and 2003 to 2004). Each
ARV was given a cerebral penetration-effectiveness (CPE) score graded from 0 (low
penetration) to 1 (high penetration) according (0: didanosine [ddI], tenofovir
[TNF], dideoxycytidine [ddC], amprenavir [APV], nelfinavir [NFV], ritonavir [RTV],
saquinavir [SQV], SQV/ritonavir[r], tipranavir [TPV]/r, enfuvirtide [T20]; 0.5:
lamivudine [3TC], stavudine [d4T], elfinavir [EFV], APV/r, FPV/r, atazanavir [ATZ]/r,
darunavir [DRV]/r; 1: abacavir [ABC], FTC, zidovudine [AZT], delavirdine [DLV],
nevirapine [NVP], indinavir [IDV], IDV/r, lopinavir [LPV]/r). For each patient,
the regimen CPE score was calculated as the sum of the scores of each ARV and
considered as a time-dependent covariate with 3 categories: no antiretroviral,
ARV regimen with CPE score <1.5 and ARV regimen with CPE score ≥1.5.
Results: During the study period, 1427 patients diagnosed with PML were
included, 923 of them died. During the follow-up, 663 patients received ARV
regimen with CPE score ≥1.5. In the pre-cART period, 1-year survival
after diagnosis was 19.8% (16.6%, 23.0%); it was 54.1% (50.2%, 58.0%) in 1996
to 2004. Compared with no ARV treatment, adjusted mortality hazards ratio
associated to ARV regimen with a CPE score <1.5 during the follow-up was
1.04 (0.87, 1.24) and adjusted mortality HR associated to ARV regimen with a
CPE score ≥1.5 was 0.62 (0.49, 0.79).
Conclusions: Survival after a PML diagnosis
improved dramatically in the cART era as compared to the pre-cART era. Moreover,
ARV regimen including drugs with high CNS penetration lead to a better
survival. These results suggest that the control of HIV replication in
the CNS plays a role in the containment of PML, distinct from JCV-specific
cellular immune recovery.
|