Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 135 Poster Abstracts
New Mechanisms of HIV-1 Drug Resistance
Session Day and Time: Monday, 1-4 pm
Room: Hall B


853    
Discordant Effects of Gag Cleavage Site Mutations on the IC50 of Protease Inhibitors and on HIV Replicative Capacity
Romina Quercia*1, E Dam1,2, D Descamps3, X Duval3, A Hance1, and F Clavel1
1INSERM U552, Paris, France; 2Eurofins-Viralliance, Paris, France; and 3Hosp Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France

Background:  Protease (PR) and Gag cleavage-site mutations occur in vivo and in vitro under selective pressure by protease inhibitors (PI). Cleavage-site mutations have been described as able to partially compensate for the loss of replicative capacity of PI-resistant viruses. However, the extent that these mutations are also involved in changes in resistance, and the relationship between changes in IC50 and changes in replicative capacity remain to be determined.

Methods:  NL4-3- based molecular clones carrying sequences from 3 highly resistant patient-derived viruses (ANRS109 Vista study) were constructed. Recombinants carried either the whole Gag, PR, and reverse transcriptase (RT) sequences (BS Clones) or PR and RT sequences without Gag (XS clones). Two of the viruses (VIS13 and VIS18) had selected cleavage site mutation A431V and one (VIS16) had selected I437V. These naturally selected mutations were removed from the BS clones and introduced in the XS clones by site-directed mutagenesis. Drug susceptibility and replication capacity were determined using a single-cycle assay.

 Results:  The removal of cleavage site mutations from BS clones produced strong reductions in IC50 to levels that were not significantly different from that of the XS clones, which lacked patient-derived Gag sequences. Correspondingly, the addition of cleavage site mutations in XS clones restored resistance to levels comparable to that of BS clones. By contrast, the reduction in replicative capacity produced by removal of cleavage site mutations from BS clones was only partial, while their addition in XS clones fully restored replicative capacity to levels comparable to that of BS clones.

Conclusions:  Gag cleavage site mutations not only affect replicative capacity, but also strongly contribute to resistance. Interestingly, their removal is sufficient to promote strong changes in IC50, but not sufficient to promote comparable changes in replicative capacity. These findings suggest that cleavage site mutations play a direct and important role in resistance, but that they work in concert with other Gag determinants to improve viral fitness.