532
Acceptance of Routine HIV Testing in Medical Inpatients in Nigeria: Implications for a New HIV Testing Approach in Sub-Saharan Africa
Olusegun Busari*1, M Nakayima2, O Busari1, G Oligbu1, A Adeyemi3, L Onigbogi4, and HIV STUDY GROUP
1Federal Med Ctr, Ido-Ekiti, Nigeria; 2AIDS Support Org, Masaka, Uganda; 3Hlthmatch Intl, Lagos, Nigeria; and 4Univ Coll Hosp, Ibadan, Nigeria
Background: The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC)’s new revised guidelines for HIV testing (September 2006)
recommend routine voluntary HIV testing in all health care settings. This HIV
testing approach has been a subject of intense debate and controversy among HIV
stakeholders, activists, and people living with HIV and AIDS in Nigeria and elsewhere. Here, the objective was to identify potential patient barriers to
routine HIV testing in Nigeria
Methods: We screened for enrolment 840 consecutive
admissions into the medical wards of 3 Nigerian tertiary hospitals.
Interviewer-administered structured questionnaire was administered by house
interns. The questionnaire included questions on sociodemographic data, reasons
for nonparticipation in the study and for not testing for HIV, high-risk behaviors,
and other risk factors for HIV. Consented patients could choose to complete the
questionnaire alone, or to complete the questionnaire and undergo rapid HIV
test.
Results: Of the patients screened for enrolment, 622
(74%) consented to participate in the study, of whom 508 (82%) chose to
complete the questionnaire and undergo rapid HIV test, and 114 (18%) chose to
complete the questionnaire alone. Another 118 (26%) declined to participate in
the study. Patients who declined to participate in the study were more likely
to be female (75% vs 44%, p = 0.014), single (66% vs 51%, p =
0.02), of low socioeconomic class (89% vs 32%, p <0.001), and younger
than 35 years (62% vs 54%, p = 0.04). Major reasons for nonparticipation
were: fear of stigma (42%), not considering themselves having risk factors for
HIV (37%), and having previously been tested for HIV (29%). Of the patients who
participated in the study, 260 (42%) had ≥1 risk factor for HIV, while
174 (28%) had >2 risk factors, but did not consider themselves at risk of
HIV; 37 of 508 patients (7.2%) who did the HIV testing were positive for HIV;
more than three-quarters of whom had ≥risk factors for HIV.
Conclusions: The study shows that almost half of
patients who participated in the study had ≥1 risk factors for HIV, but
never considered themselves at risk of HIV. This study reinforces the assertion
that risk-based HIV testing fails to identify all HIV+ and the feasibility
of routine rapid HIV testing in inpatients not only in Nigeria but all of Sub-Saharan Africa.
|