576 
Nevirapine Exposure with WHO Pediatric Weight Band Dosing--Enhanced Therapeutic Concentrations Predicted Based on Extensive International Pharmacokinetic Experience
Edmund Capparelli*1, D Kabamba2, T Cressey3,4, and D Burger5
1Univ of California, San Diego, US; 2Univ Teaching Hosp, Lusaka, Zambia; 3Harvard Sch of Publ Hlth, Prgm for HIV Prevention and Treatement, Boston, MA, US; 4Chiang Mai Univ, Thailand; and 5Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, The Netherlands
Background: To achieve therapeutic concentrations across
the pediatric age continuum, nevirapine (NVP) is dosed based on body surface
area (150 to 200 mg/m2) or weight and age (7 mg/kg <8 years
and 4 mg/kg ≥8 years). In resource limited settings, these dosing
guidelines are too complex for wide spread implementation. The World Health
Organization (WHO) has developed a simple weight-band dosing algorithm suitable
for these settings, but the ability of this strategy to achieve therapeutic NPV
exposure has not been assessed. The objective of this study was to determine
the NVP exposure expected from the WHO dosing guidelines and compared it to Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) dosing.
Methods: NVP pharmacokinetic data across 5 Pediatric AIDS
Clinical Trials Group (PACTG) studies conducted in the United States were
combined with data from Zambia (CHAPAS) and Thailand (IMPAACT P1056), totaling
565 pediatric subjects. The AUC and Cmin with WHO dosing using 50-
to 60-mg tablets were determined from the ratio of doses (parameter x WHO
Dose/Study Dose). The frequency of sub-therapeutic concentrations (Cmin
<3 µg/mL or AUC <48 µg·h/mL) and supra-therapeutic concentrations, 120 µg·h/mL
(2x average) were determined. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed using a
population pharmacokinetic model that included age, weight, ritonavir (RTV) use,
and CYP 2B6 genotype. Using weight-band dosing, 7720 pediatric NVP
concentration profiles were simulated.
Results: NVP AUC and Cmin were similar across
the 3 countries. Excluded from the analysis were 94 subjects receiving RTV and
88 subjects outside the WHO dosing weight groups (<5 or >30 kg). The
median (IQR) dose, Cmin and AUC were 174 mg/m2 (162 to 187),
5.7 µg/mL (3.8 to 8.0), and 77.7 µg·h/mL (55.8 to 107.2) for WHO 50-mg dosing
and 153 mg/m2 (112 to 172), 4.6 µg/mL (3.0 to 6.9), and 62.2 µg·h/mL
(45.1 to 90.8) for FDA dosing. WHO dosing exceeded Cmin and AUC
targets in 85% and 84% of subjects. The FDA dose met these targets in only 75%
and 72% of subjects. The frequency of AUC >120 was higher with WHO than FDA
dosing (18% vs 10%). Increasing the NVP tablet dose from 50 to 60 mg reduced
the frequency of sub-therapeutic levels by 5%, but increased supra-therapeutic
levels by 12%. Monte Carlo simulation exceeded target AUC and Cmin
in 77% of virtual patients.
Conclusions: The WHO weight-band dosing of NVP achieves
therapeutic concentrations in a greater portion of subjects than the FDA dose
of 4 to 7 mg/kg. The 50-mg tablet strength maximizes the therapeutic index. WHO
weight-band dosing should be used in resource-limited settings.
|