577 
Nevirapine Pharmacokinetics in Thai Children Receiving either an Adult or Pediatric Fixed-dose Combination of Stavudine, Lamivudine, and Nevirapine
Kulkanya Chokephaibulkit*1, T Cressey2,3, W Prasitsuebsai1, N Vanprapar1, T Chotpityasunondh4, K Frederix5, J Kraimer6, R Yogev7, and E Capparelli8
1Siriraj Hosp, Bangkok, Thailand; 2Harvard Sch of Publ Hlth, Boston, MA, US; 3Chiang Mai Univ, Thailand; 4Queen Sirikit Natl Inst of Child Hlth, Bangkok, Thailand; 5Medicines Sans Frontieres; 6Social & Sci Systems, Silver Spring, MD, US; 7Chicago Children`s Memorial Hosp, IL, US; and 8Univ of California, San Diego, US
Background: Due in part to lack of affordable
antiretrovirals and convenience of a fixed-dose combination tablet, a large
number of HIV-infected children in Thailand receive an adult fixed-dose
combination of stavudine (d4T)/lamivudine (3TC)/nevirapine (NVP) (30/150/200
mg/tablet), which often requires breaking the tablet to obtain an appropriate
dose. Previous studies suggested satisfactory NVP exposure and good clinical
response in this setting, but fixed-dose combination tablets designed for
children are urgently needed. A new pediatric chewable fixed-dose combination tablet
of d4T/3TC/NVP (7/30/50 mg/tablet) has been developed by the Thailand
Government Pharmaceutical Organization. Limited data on NVP exposure in
children using different fixed-dose combination are available. We assessed NVP pharmacokinetics
in Thai children receiving either adult (GPOvir®S30) or pediatric (GPOvir®S7)
fixed-dose combination.
Methods: NVP concentration information from 44
children (average age 8.6±2.9 yrsrs and weight 24.3±8.3 kg) was combined from 2
clinical studies. NVP plasma level results from 9 children enrolled in IMPAACT
P1056, an ongoing pharmacokinetic study comparing GPOvir®S7 with the
standard liquid formulations, who had intensive pharmacokinetic sampling collected
pre-dose, and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours post-dose were combined with data
from a separate study of 35 children who received GPOvir®S30 and had
pharmacokinetic sampling collected pre-dose, and 2, 6 hours post-dose. Pharmacokinetic
data were analyzed using a 1-compartment model and population approach with the
program NONMEM. Formulation differences in absorption were assessed by changes
in objective function.
Results: Independent of formulation, median NVP
clearance was 0.081 L/h/kg and volume of distribution 1.79 L/kg. NVP GPOvir®S30
profiles exhibited a slower rate of absorption (p <0.001), but had comparable
bioavailability (p >0.20) to GPOvir®S7. Average NVP AUC
was 75.5±40.5 and 81.1±34.7 µg·hr/mL for GPOvir®S30 and GPOvir®S7,
respectively. Due to a “flatter” concentration profile, median pre-dose NVP
concentrations were higher with GPOvir®S30 compared to GPOvir®S7,
6.0 µg/mL (3.4 to 24.0) vs 4.3 µg/mL (3.0 to 10.0), p = 0.06. All
children achieved a pre-dose NVP concentration above the recommend target therapeutic
threshold of 3.0 µg/mL.
Conclusions: NVP pharmacokinetic parameters in Thai
children using fixed-dose combination tablets containing either NVP 200 mg or
50 mg were within the range observed in prior pediatric studies. No clinically
significant differences in NVP pharmacokinetics were observed between the 2
different strength NVP formulations.
|