Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 22 Oral Abstracts
New Mechanisms of Resistance and Virologic Failure
Session Day and Time: Tuesday, 10-11:30 am
Presentation Time: 10:00 am
Room: Ballroom B/C


79
Mechanism by which N348I in HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Confers Dual Zidovudine/Nevirapine Resistance
Soo-Huey Yap*1,2, J Radzio3,4, N Sluis-Cremer3, and G Tachedjian1,5
1Burnet Inst, Melbourne, Australia; 2Monash Univ, Churchill, Australia; 3Univ of Pittsburgh Sch of Med, PA, US; 4Univ of Pittsburgh Grad Sch of Publ Hlth, PA, US; and 5Monash Univ, Clayton, Australia

Background:  The efficacy of combination therapies that include zidovudine (AZT) and nevirapine (NVP) for the treatment of HIV-1 infection can be explained, in part, by the observed synergy between these drugs and the antagonism between their respective resistance mutations (e.g., K70R for AZT and Y181C for NVP). The molecular mechanism of synergy between these 2 drugs is complex and involves a direct effect of NVP on the chemistry of AZT-MP excision, and also a NVP-induced stimulation of reverse transcriptase (RT) RNase H activity which indirectly affects AZT-MP excision by prematurely destroying the RNA/DNA duplex. We recently described the identification of N348I, which occurs early in AZT/NVP based therapies and confers resistance to both drugs. The objective of this study was to determine the biochemical mechanisms responsible for this phenotype.

Methods:  The AZT-MP excision activity of wild type and mutant (N348I, K70R, Y181C) HIV-1 RT was assessed in the absence and presence of NVP using different, but complementary, biochemical assay systems. The effects of the resistance mutations, alone and in combination with NVP, on RNase H activity of the RT were also investigated.

Results:  N348I confers dual AZT/NVP resistance via 2 inter-related mechanisms. In the first, N348I decreases the ability of NVP to inhibit HIV-1 RT. In the second, N348I significantly decreases the rate of RT RNase H cleavage, which provides RT with more time to efficiently excise AZT-MP from an RNA/DNA template/primer. Furthermore, the ability of NVP to stimulate RNase H is also significantly reduced compared with the wild type enzyme. Therefore, when both AZT-TP and NVP are combined in RNA-dependent DNA polymerization reactions, the combined effects of N348I on NVP binding, RNase H activity, and AZT-MP excision activity allows the enzyme to replicate relatively efficiently. In comparison, the K70R mutations confer AZT resistance but remains sensitive to NEV inhibition, and Y181C confers NVP resistance, but is hyper-sensitive to inhibition by AZT.

Conclusions:  This study defines the mechanism by which N348I confers dual AZT/NVP resistance and explains why this mutation may be selected in response to therapies containing these drugs. Furthermore, it expands our knowledge of how mutations, distal from the polymerase active site and NNRTI-binding pocket, can confer drug resistance.