44
Timing of Infection Is Critical for Nevirapine Resistance Outcomes among Breastfed Subtype C HIV-1-infected Infants Exposed to Extended vs Single-dose Nevirapine Prophylaxis: The India SWEN Study
Anitha Moorthy*1, A Gupta2, G Sastry3, V Venkatramani4, R Bhosale4, V Kulkarni3, N Gupte3, C Ziemniak2, R Bollinger2, D Persaud2, and on behalf of the India SWEN Study Team
1Johns Hopkins Univ Bloomberg Sch of Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD, US; 2Johns Hopkins Univ Sch of Med, Baltimore, MD, US; 3BJ Med Coll and Johns Hopkins Univ, Pune, India; and 4BJ Med Coll, Pune, India
Background: As part of a prospective, randomized,
double-blind controlled trial in India to address efficacy of extended-dose nevirapine
(NVP) prophylaxis in preventing breast-milk transmission of HIV-1, we compared NVP
resistance among infants exposed to extended-dose NVP vs single-dose NVP by
timing of HIV-1 infection and receipt of maternal single-dose NVP.
Methods: Single-dose NVP-exposed infants were
randomized and masked to receive Eextended-dose NVP + multivitamins or multivitamins
alone once daily from day 8 until 42 of life. HIV-1 DNA polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) was done at 48 hours and week 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 14 and month
6, 9, and 12 of age. Timing of infection was based on 4 groups: in utero (IU: positive by 48 hours; n = 23); peripartum/early breastfeeding (positive at week 1 to 6; n
= 19); late breast-fed ( positive at week10 to 14; n = 18), and very
late breast-fed (positive at ≥6 months; n = 19). HIV-1
population-based genotyping was done on infant plasma samples collected on
visit following positive DNA PCR. NVP resistance between and among extended-dose
NVP and single-dose NVP exposed infant groups were compared using Fishers exact
tests. Multivariate logistic regression modeled correlates of NVP resistance.
Results: Of 99 plasma samples, 89 (90%) were
available for study. Population-based genotyping was successful in 86 (97%); 79
(92%) had samples that were a median of 28 days since HIV diagnosis. Extended-dose
NVP infants infected within 6 weeks of age had higher NVP resistance than single-dose
NVP infants (11 of 12 [92%] vs 12 of 30 [40%]; p = 0.005). However,
extent (>1 mutation) and type of NVP resistance were not different for all
infant groups at the population level; extended-dose NVP in 5 of 13 (38%) vs single-dose
NVP in 4 of 16 (25%); Y181C (40% vs 32%) being the most common, followed by K103N
(30% vs 21%) and Y188C (16% vs 10%); p>0.5. NVP resistance in infants
infected within 14 weeks of age and born to women with and without NVP receipt
was also similar (infant extended-dose NVP 6 of 11 [55%] vs 5 of 7 [71%], p
= 0.64; infant single-dose NVP 10 of 25 [40%] vs 5 of 17 [29%]; p = 0.48).
After adjusting for infant treatment by receipt of maternal NVP with or without
antepartum zidovudine, late breast-fed and very late breast-fed infants were
less likely to have NVP resistance than infants infected early (intrauterine,
post-partum, and early breast-fed) (late breast-fed, OR = 0.15; 0.03 to 0.64; very
late breast-fed, OR = 0.06; 0.01 to 0.34).
Conclusions: Higher rates of NVP resistance were seen
in extended-dose NVP-exposed infants infected within 6 weeks of life. However,
among infants who escaped early infection, wild type
HIV-1 is predominantly transmitted through breast milk. Maternal single-dose NVP
receipt, however, did not seem to influence this finding in our study. These
results may be important for use of extended-dose NVP prophylaxis for
preventing breast-milk transmission and subsequent therapy for infants.
|