992
Lactate Measurement of Patients with Suspected Lactic Acidosis with a Hand-held Analyzer in a Large Outpatient HIV Clinic in Kampala, Uganda
A Kiragga1, P Ocama1, Steve Reynolds*2, H Ojiambo1, A Kambugu1, and B Castelnuovo1
1Infectious Disease Inst, Kampala, Uganda and 2Rakai Hlth Svcs Prgm, Uganda
Background: In resource-limited settings patients
are frequently started on stavudine (d4T) -containing regimens, which can lead
to hyperlactatemia or lactic acidosis, a potentially fatal syndrome. At the
Infectious Diseases Institute Ltd, Uganda 2634 of the 4440 patients (59%) on ART
were started on d4T-containing regimens. Lactate measurements are often not
available in resource-limited settings, and where available the test is
expensive ($7) and hampered by long laboratory turn-around times (minimum 6 hours).
Our objective was to validate a point-of-care hand-held lactate analyzer
comparing it with our laboratory chemistry analyzer.
Methods: The hand-held analyzer (Accutrend, Roche Diagnostics, Germany) uses chemistry test strips to which a drop of blood is applied.
The turn-around time is 60 seconds and the price is approximately $226 for the
machine, and $2.30 per test strip. Results obtained were compared to results
from the hospital laboratory (Cobas Intergra, Roche Diagnostics, Germany). Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficient (r) was used to determine the
degree of association between lactate concentrations derived from the hand-held
analyzer and the hospital laboratory results. The level of agreement between
the 2 methods was assessed using the methods described by Bland and Altman.
Results: Serum lactate levels ranged from 1.1 to 6.7
mM/L. The mean lactate levels were 3.16 and 3.06 mM/L (hand-held analyzer and
hospital laboratory respectively) and SD were 1.19 and 1.54 mM/L (hand-held analyzer
and hospital laboratory respectively). There was a strong correlation (R2
= 0.94; p <0.001; slope = 0.65) between the serum lactate
concentrations obtained with the 2 methods of measurement. The bias (mean
difference) was –0.064 mM/L (95%CI –0.239 to 0.112). Lactate measurements from
the hand-held lactate analyzer machine were lower by 1.36 mM/L and higher by
1.23 mM/L, than those obtained by the reference machine (limits of agreement –1.361
to 1.234), and 95% of the measurements were within this range.
Conclusions: The hand-held lactate analyzer can
reliably be used in patients on ART with suspected hyperlactatemia at low cost
and with short turn-around time. Use of point-of-care lactate analyzers should
be considered in ART programs where majority of the patients are on d4T-containing
regimens.
|