Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 13 Poster Discussion
Poster Discussion: Emerging Patterns of Resistance to New Antiretrovirals
Session Day and Time: Monday, 2-3 pm
Room: Room 302-304


870
Emergence in vivo of Vicriviroc Resistance in HIV-1 Subtype C: Role of V3 Loop and Susceptibility to Other CCR5 Antagonists
Athe M.N. Tsibris*1,2, M Sagar2,3, Z Su4, C Flexner5, W Greaves6, P Skolnik7, E Coakley8, M Subramanian9, R Gulick10, and D Kuritzkes2,3
1Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, US; 2Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA, US; 3Brigham and Women`s Hosp, Boston, MA, US; 4Harvard Sch of Publ Hlth, Boston, MA, US; 5Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD, US; 6Schering-Plough Res Inst, Kenilworth, NJ, US; 7Boston Med Ctr, MA, US; 8Monogram Biosci, South San Francisco, CA, US; 9Human Genome Sci, Rockville, MD, US; and 10Weill Med Coll of Cornell Univ, New York, NY, US

Background:  We previously identified a CCR5-using (R5) HIV-1 isolate with high-level resistance to the CCR5 antagonist vicriviroc (VCV) in 1 of 29 VCV-treated subjects with virologic failure in AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 5211, a phase IIb study of this drug in triple-class experienced subjects. Emergence of VCV resistance was associated with accumulation of mutations in the V3 loop stem of gp120. We sought to determine the role of these V3 loop mutations in VCV resistance, and their effect on HIV-1 susceptibility to other entry inhibitors.

Methods:  VCV susceptibility (PhenoSense Entry Susceptibility assay), cloning, and sequencing of full-length env (gp160) were performed on plasma HIV-1 samples obtained at entry, confirmation of virologic failure (week 19), and at week 28. Using yeast gap repair homologous recombination, we incorporated the predominant subject-derived full-length env clone observed at each time point into an NL4-3 backbone to generate infectious recombinant HIV. Viruses were grown in 293T cells, titered, and used to infect a CCR5-expressing reporter cell line (TZM-bl) in the presence and absence of increasing concentrations of VCV, TAK779, enfuvirtide, or a CCR5 monoclonal antibody. We then constructed chimeric env molecules incorporating segments (gp120, gp41, V1-V3 segment, or V3 loop alone) of the week 28 env into a week 0 env backbone to determine which env domain(s) were responsible for the observed VCV resistance.

Results:  Sequence and phylogenetic analysis showed the envelope from this subject clustered with HIV-1 subtype C genotypes. Susceptibility testing of recombinant chimeric viruses showed that insertion of V3 loop alone from the week 28 virus conferred resistance to VCV and cross-resistance to TAK779. Infection by VCV-resistant recombinants was enhanced by increasing VCV and TAK779 concentrations. No effect on enfuvirtide susceptibility was noted. VCV resistance sensitized virus to inhibition by the competitive CCR5 antagonist HGS004, resulting in a 5.4-fold decrease in HGS004 IC50

Conclusions:  These findings demonstrate that mutations in the V3 loop stem of a clade C virus are sufficient to confer VCV resistance and cross-resistance to at least one other small-molecule CCR5 antagonist. Enhanced susceptibility to the competitive CCR5 antagonist HGS004 may be due to decreased ability of VCV-resistant env to bind the native CCR5 receptor.