785 
Prediction of AIDS-defining Illnesses or Death after the Initiation of HAART
Bryan Lau*1,2, S Gange2, G Chander1, J Keruly1, and R Moore1,2
1Johns Hopkins Univ Sch of Med, Baltimore, MD, US and 2Johns Hopkins Univ Bloomberg Sch of Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD, US
Background: HAART has dramatically reduced the
incidence of AIDS-defining illnesses and mortality in HIV-infected individuals,
yet these events continue to occur after initiating therapy. Developing and
evaluating prediction models for the development of an individual’s first AIDS-defining
illnesses or death after HAART remains an important goal. Utilizing extensive
data from persons in the Johns Hopkins HIV Clinical Cohort (Baltimore, Maryland), we developed a new prediction model and compared it to published models.
Methods: Utilizing data from persons who initiated
HAART from 1996 through 2004, we constructed proportional hazards prediction
models for the development of first AIDS-defining illnesses or death. We assessed
discrimination using time-varying area under the receiver operating
characteristic curve (AUC). Analyses were conducted on both a composite (death
or AIDS-defining illness) and cause-specific competing-risks endpoint.
Variables evaluated at the time of HAART initiation (time-stationary) included CD4
count, HIV RNA, total lymphocyte count, hemoglobin, albumin, and creatinine
levels, prior AIDS-defining illness, Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia prophylaxis,
sex, race, age, injection drug use (IDU), history of heavy alcohol use, heroin
or cocaine use, and a medical history of personality disorder, anxiety,
depression, schizophrenia, or suicide attempt.
Results: Of 2961 individuals who initiated HAART
1235 contributed events (772 AIDS-defining illnesses, 463 deaths) over 10,728
person-years of follow-up. Our prediction model gave a mean AUC over 5 years of
0.73. Variables associated with shorter time to first AIDS-defining illness or
death included: CD4, HIV RNA, total lymphocyte count, hemoglobin, and albumin
levels, age, prior AIDS-defining illness, IDU, PCP prophylaxis, cocaine use,
anxiety and depression. This model provided better discrimination at 6 months
(AUC = 0.73) than a published prediction model (AUC = 0.68) that used CD4, HIV
RNA, anemia, body mass index, age, ARV use prior to HAART, IDU, and prior AIDS-defining
illness. Splitting the composite outcome into competing events resulted in similar
6-month discrimination estimates with the exception of candidiasis (AUC = 0.65).
Conclusions: We have developed a prediction model
for AIDS-defining illnesses and death that has improved ability to discriminate
these serious events relative to a published algorithm. As our model retained non-laboratory
measures, this suggests their importance in predicting HAART response. This
framework highlights an important goal for future clinical research of
identifying and validating new measures that improve clinical prediction of
competing events.
|