756 
Positron Emission Tomography Agent for Non-invasive Imaging of Antiretroviral Drug Penetration and Kinetics in vivo
Michele Di Mascio*1, S Srinivasula2, M Collins3, E Lim4, L Cheng1, and D Kiesewetter5
1NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, MD, US; 2SAIC-Frederick, MD, US; 3Bioqual Inc, Rockville, MD, US; 4Univ of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, US; and 5Natl Inst of Biomed Imaging and BioEngineering, NIH, Bethesda, MD,US
Background: Antiviral
efficacy, dosing, and toxicity of current regimens are mostly derived from
plasma or blood kinetics of anti-HIV drugs. However, the blood comprises only
2% of total target cells in the body. Drug penetration may vary in anatomic compartments
and among subjects. In addition to viral resistance, prolonged antiviral
treatment may affect mechanisms of drug retention in the host cells that can
diminish efficacy over time. Sub-optimal therapy in tissues has been postulated
as possible cause of therapy failure, however little is known about drug
distribution in tissues (especially in longitudinal analyses), mainly due to target
tissues inaccessibility. Here, we describe the tissue drug kinetics of the NRTI
tenofovir (R-PMPA) and its 18F-radiolabeled analogue (S-FPMPA), a
potential ligand for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging
Methods: The synthesis
and radiofluorination of the analogue followed literature precedent. S-FPMPA
inhibitory activity was determined in MT4 cells infected with simian-human
immunodeficiency virus (SHIV). To confirm the similarity of biodistribution
between the 2 analogues, we have performed a study in rats with dual labeling. We
dissected 12 rats at 4 time-points after intravenous co-injection of unlabeled PMPA (5 mg/kg), 14C
-PMPA (5
µCi) and 18F -PMPA (200
µCi)
Results: The
products of radio-synthesis had high radiochemical and enantiomeric purity. S-FPMPA
showed inhibitory activity of viral replication with an IC50 of 1.85
µM, similar to R-PMPA. For in vivo biodistribution, data (see the figure)
show good overlapping of 14C -PMPA and 18F -FPMPA kinetics
in several organs. The similarity in femur uptake (tissue with high avidity for
unbound fluoride), suggested that 18F-fluoride is not a metabolite
of F-PMPA. Intra-subject variability of the drug trough concentration in
certain tissues (jejunum, Peyer’s patches > 60%) is not revealed by the blood
compartment (10%). Kinetics in kidney show drug accumulation, which might be
associated to tenofovir-induced nephrotoxicity
Conclusion: S-18F
-FPMPA is a candidate imaging probe for the distribution of tenofovir in
tissues in vivo. Drug penetration varies between anatomic compartments
and subjects. Potential areas of animal research and clinical investigation
that could benefit from this technique are: longitudinal analysis of drug
kinetics during chronic treatment; drug interactions; drug volume of distribution
after topical administration in microbicide studies; and generalization of the
concept of antiviral efficacy

|