Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 157 Poster Abstracts
Changes in Bone Mineral Density
Session Day and Time: Tuesday, 1-4 pm
Room: Hall B


965    
Short-term Bone Loss in HIV-infected Premenopausal Women
Michael Yin*1, S Cremers1, D Lu2, E Shane1, W Gao2, D McMahon1, and K Anastos2
1Columbia Univ Med Ctr, New York, NY, US and 2Montefiore Med Ctr, Bronx, NY, US

Background:  Low bone density is prevalent among HIV+ women. Data on short term bone loss, fracture risk and effect of antiretrovirals are limited. 

Methods:  In 114 HIV+ and 74 HIV– premenopausal women enrolled in the Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS), bone density was measured by dual X-ray aborptiometry at the femoral neck and lumbar spine at baseline and at 2 years. Baseline serum levels of bone formation (osteocalcin and bone alkaline phosphatase) and bone resorption (N-telopeptide) markers, and pro-resorptive cytokines (interleukin-6 [IL-6], tumor necrosis factor –alpha [TNF-α], and receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand [RANKL]) were determined.

Results:  HIV+ women were older than HIV– (41±5 vs 37±7 years, p = 0.0002) and had lower current body mass index (29±6 vs 31±6 kg/m2, p = 0.04), but were similar with regard to race (81 vs 77% non-white, p = 0.81), and prevalence of smoking, alcohol use, heroin use, diabetes, calcium and vitamin D supplementation. HIV+ women had lower baseline lumbar spine bone density than HIV– (1.26±0.15 vs 1.30±0.16 g/cm2, p = 0.05) and lower femoral neck bone density (1.04±0.1 vs 1.09±0.2 g/cm2, p = 0.02). femoral neck bone density was lowest in HIV+ women on protease inhibitor (PI) -based HAART (HIV+PI+) (0.99±0.14 g/cm2). Prevalence of femoral neck low bone density (T score <–1) was 17% in HIV+PI+, 6% in HIV+ on non-PI-based HAART (HIV+PI–) and 7% in HIV–. Baseline serum bone turnover marker and cytokine levels were similar between HIV+ and HIV–. Annual percentage change in bone density was similar in HIV+ and HIV– at femoral neck (–0.88±3.3 vs –0.61±1.9%, p = 0.76) and lumbar spine (–0.96±2.1 vs –0.45±2.2%, p = 0.26), after adjusting for age and body mass index in mixed model analysis. Among HIV+, N-telopeptide levels were higher among HIV+PI+ in comparison to ART-naive (14.33±8.6 vs 10.09±3.8 nM bone collagen equivalents/L, p = 0.04) and bone alkaline phosphatase lower among HIV+PI+ in comparison to HIV+PI– (28.72±10.4 vs 36.87±13.7 U/L, p = 0.03); however annual percentage change in bone density was similar between all treatment groups. Lastly, over a 2-year follow-up, occurrence of new self-reported fragility fractures was similar between the 2 groups (3%).

Conclusions:  In premenopausal HIV+ women, baseline bone density was lower than comparable HIV– women but rates of short term bone loss at the lumbar spine and femoral neck and fragility fracture were similar. In HIV+ women on PI-based HAART, elevated bone resorption and depressed bone formation markers did not translate to increased bone loss.