917
Accurate Representation of in vivo HIV-1 Quasispecies Plays an Important Role in the Quantification of Viral Tropism: A Comparison of 3 Different Methods to Generate env-Recombinant Viruses
J Weber1, K Henry2, R Gibson2, J Weberova1, A Vazquez1, E Arts2, and Miguel E Quinones-Mateu*1
1Diagnostic Hybrids Inc, Cleveland, OH, US and 2Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH, US
Background: Deep sampling of the HIV-1 quasispecies
in infected patients is essential for low frequency detection of wild type
versus drug-resistant clones and of CCR5- versus CXCR4-tropic HIV-1 clones for
correct administration of the R5 antagonist, Maraviroc. We compared 3 cloning
methods to produce patient-derived env polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product:
classical restriction site and ligation cloning in bacteria, recombination in
eukaryotic cells, and recombination in yeast.
Methods: An env fragment containing gp120 and most
of gp41 (~2.5 kb) was real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) amplified
from plasma of 10 ART-experienced individuals. The same PCR product was introduced
into env expression vector for pseudotyped virus production using bacterial
restriction enzyme/ligation cloning or in chimeric viruses via recombination in
mammalian cells or yeast. We used both Sanger and pyro454 sequencing to measure
genetic diversity of HIV-1 clones directly from plasma as well as cloned via
bacteria, mammalian, and yeast cloning systems. Finally, co-receptor usage was
determined by infecting U87.CD4.CCR5 or U87.CD4.CXCR4 cells.
Results: Phylogenetic analyses on about 1000 clones indicate
that yeast-based recombination best approximates the diversity and structure of
the HIV-1 quasispecies in the plasma samples. In contrast, a stringent
bottleneck and frequent re-sampling resulted from bacterial cloning and even
more, from recombination in mammalian cells. Using the phenotypic assays, R5 virus
clones predominated in the quasispecies from all 10 plasma samples. Higher
frequencies of X4 variants (>20%) were identified when sampled by all
methods but only the yeast-based approach could sufficiently sample the
quasispecies for detection of low frequency X4 variants (1 to 20%). Due to resampling
error, several X4 lineages found in plasma and sampled by the yeast method,
were absent in the phylogenetic trees derived from bacteria cloning and mammalian
recombination methods.
Conclusions: The success of CCR5 antagonists in HIV-1
therapy is dependent on detection of X4 HIV-1 variants in the patient’s
quasispecies. However, a significant limitation of current detection methods is
related to a cloning bottleneck and resampling error as opposed to the
threshold of phenotypic assay. Chimeric env viruses derived from yeast-based
recombination/cloning best approximated the HIV-1 genetic diversity in plasma
and were at least 4- to 200-fold more diverse than viruses derived from more
classical cloning approaches.
|